On 8/10/07, Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have my doubts about what would be best for entering. My ideas so far
> are
>
> I'm favoring 3 over 2, even though it'd rule out using '1' for zoom
> 100%. I think 4 would be confusing and hard to code. But is 1 too
> non-intuitive? Are
Hi. On the Select menu, there is a radio-group option for: Replace, Union,
Intersection, Remove, Inverse.
I have played with these and I can't get them to do anything. If they do
something, I'd like to add something in the help documentation.
I'm working on 0.96.1 on WinXP. Thanks. Mark Dexter
__
Hi. In the Authors chapter, the links for GNOME Documentation Project (
http://www.gnome.org/gdp) and GNOME Documentation Status Table (
http://www.gnome.org/gdp/doctable/) don't work. Are there new URL's for
these or should they be removed from the documentation? Thanks. Mark Dexter
__
Hello again. As I've thought about it a little more, I am worried that some
users will be annoyed by option (1). Users don't like changes that "break"
something that use to work. So I'm now thinking that option (2) or (3) might
be best. Would it be feasible to allow the program to continue to work
On Thu, 9 Aug 2007, Lars Clausen wrote:
I have my doubts about what would be best for entering. My ideas so far
are
1) Press "Enter" to start editing text. Pro: Frees all other keys for
shortcuts. Con: Non-obvious
Sounds ok to me, although somewhat non-obvious. I'd expect that clicking
i
I think option 1 would probably be the best. However, I'd offer another
method as well - double clicking on the item to start editing the text. I
know this currently brings up the properties - but I feel normal users are
much more likely to want to edit text than change the item properties.
I'm
I think this is a very good idea. That way you could use the mouse to select
text and copy / paste would be more intutive. I think that (1) would be
fine. If you put an option for "Edit Text" on the right-click context
menu (when an object is selected) and/or on the Edit menu, then people could
fin
On Thu, 09 Aug 2007 22:57:38 +0200, Lars Clausen wrote
> I'm strong considering splitting diagram editing into a "normal" mode
> and a "text-edit" mode.
I always think of two different "text-edit" modes; for example, loading an
UML-BOX we can, without any double clicking, we can write some title
I'm strong considering splitting diagram editing into a "normal" mode
and a "text-edit" mode. It will allow for more powerful text editing
down the road, use of more shortcuts in normal mode, avoidance of the
"Delete destroys the object" in text-edit mode and more. While I have
no problem with ho
Snapshots available at http://www.raeder.dk/~larsrc/Dia/snapshots
*** Recent ChangeLog entries:
--- ChangeLog.previous 2007-08-09 05:00:14.0 +0200
+++ dia-svn-snapshot/ChangeLog 2007-08-10 05:00:14.134421168 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,45 @@
+2007-08-09 Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
+
+
10 matches
Mail list logo
