On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Daniele Pighin wrote:
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 16:59:01 +0100
> From: Daniele Pighin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Poll!
>
> [15:24, sabato 21 febbraio 2004] - Alan G Isaac ha scritto:
>
> > I found it worked best to
On Sat, Feb 21, 2004 at 01:01:06PM +, Alan Horkan wrote:
> I'm writing this message as a first attempt to regularly summarize some of
> what has being going on with Dia for the past week/month or perhaps
> longer. I intend to summarize some of the recent dicussions on the
Good idea, good work
[15:24, sabato 21 febbraio 2004] - Alan G Isaac ha scritto:
> I found it worked best to link arrowhead size to
> line width.
It _does_ make sense.
Default arrow sizing shouldn't be independent of default line width.
Daniele
___
Dia-list mailing list
[
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004, Lars Clausen apparently wrote:
> http://raeder.dk/~larsrc/Dia/LittlePoll/index.php
When I wrote an PS arrowhead procedure, long ago,
I found it worked best to link arrowhead size to
line width. I cannot tell whether the poll assumes
this issue is addressed in some way.
fwi
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 13:01:06 + (GMT), Alan Horkan wrote
> I'm writing this message as a first attempt to regularly summarize
> some of what has being going on with Dia for the past week/month or Alan:
Just to say thank you for your work.
I will be expecting the "Dia News Summary"
Lars, Cyrille, Hans, and Dia developers and users
I'm writing this message as a first attempt to regularly summarize some of
what has being going on with Dia for the past week/month or perhaps
longer. I intend to summarize some of the recent dicussions on the
mailing list and try to look at some
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004, Lars Clausen wrote:
> Date: Sat, 21 Feb 2004 11:33:00 +0100
> From: Lars Clausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Poll!
>
> On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 09:56, Joseph Carter wrote:
> > As I voted other...
> >
> > I think length
On Fri, 2004-02-20 at 09:56, Joseph Carter wrote:
> As I voted other...
>
> I think length 0.6, width 0.5 works ok.
> 0.5 both ways is too small and I think the increased length gives a
> slimmer
> look to the arrow which is more aesthetically pleasing IMHO
The only problem with that is that we'd
