According to Harry George <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Just saw an announcement today that MS is providing a spec for XML
> rendition of VISIO 2002. The document was an .exe, apparently a
> self-extracting .doc, so I didn't actually look at it. That could be
> a good approach to the problem. The blur
Jamin Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Wouldn't happen to have a link to the announcement/file would you?
Disregard. I found it, anyone know if there would be a problem with
disiminating this from my personal web-site for you developers? It bares
this statement:
This document, dated
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Jamin Collins wrote:
> Harry George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>> Just saw an announcement today that MS is providing a spec for XML
>> rendition of VISIO 2002. The document was an .exe, apparently a
>> self-extracting .doc, so I didn't actually look at it. That could
Harry George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> Just saw an announcement today that MS is providing a spec for XML
> rendition of VISIO 2002. The document was an .exe, apparently a
> self-extracting .doc, so I didn't actually look at it. That could be
> a good approach to the problem. The blur
Just to let you know that there is progress on using Freetype: I am now
able to scan directories for fonts, including TrueType and others, figure
out family names and styles, and get the width of a string. I still have
to make actual rendering, a new selection widget (to be able to select
style
Just saw an announcement today that MS is providing a spec for XML
rendition of VISIO 2002. The document was an .exe, apparently a
self-extracting .doc, so I didn't actually look at it. That could be
a good approach to the problem. The blurb said it covered everything
the native .vsd's do (i.e.
Hi again.
First let me put the most important issues and facts together:
* You have CVS access at con-struct.sourceforge.net
* The UrShapeBehaviour is still undefined.
* In what order do we traverse the tree? Remember we have two axes: Up
(Parent), Down (First Child), Left (Older brother), Right
On Tue, 10 Jul 2001, Philip Rhoades wrote:
> Lars,
>
>> > I read the archives about attempts to move files between Visio and Dia
>> > - have there been any more developments by anyone?
>>
>>No, but we've determined that the most feasible way is probably to use
>>OLE on a machine with Visio to co
Lars,
> > I read the archives about attempts to move files between Visio and Dia -
> > have there been any more developments by anyone?
>
>No, but we've determined that the most feasible way is probably to use OLE
>on a machine with Visio to convert. Other programs do that. If we get
>that runn
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, John Palmieri wrote:
> Ok, well here is my take on the UrShape.
Cool. Let's see what we have here.
> I rearanged the structures to be a bit more object oriented. I
> havent put in the behaviors yet. This is just a skeleton.
Ok so far. But I don't like the "deceased_rich_un
Ok, well here is my take on the UrShape. I rearanged the structures to be
a bit more object oriented. I havent put in the behaviors yet. This is
just a skeleton. The gist of it is that everything is a UrShape with
global ur functions to manipulate the tree. UrContainers inherit from
UrShape a
This is covered by the FAQ: See
http://www.lysator.liu.se/~alla/dia/faq.html#DieOnWindows
for the details.
Steffen
___
Dia-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/dia-list
Hi again.
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, John Palmieri wrote:
> The "normal" UrContainer should have just layout behaviors same as the
> Drag n' Drop ones without allowing Drag n' Drop.
So far so good. But how can the user add something to a UrContainer?
Or is it there at the time of Creation of the UrShap
13 matches
Mail list logo
