Hi Bob,
I think this is indeed interesting, but is it really worth spending
any time on? We currently have something that works, and for our 10
million row database in Zambia it took a few hours to import. OK,
fine, it took time, but it was a one off deal. Is there much to be
gained from a full r
2010/7/23 Bob Jolliffe
> Alright writing is pretty slow. Writing 10million records take two hours.
>
> But reading is pretty darn quick. Iterating through 10million rows
> and dumping each row to stdout (redirected to /dev/null) takes about 1
> minute +- 5 seconds. Throughout which memory use
Not sure really where this is headed, but I am not 100% sure I am
comfortable with the direction of the conversation. Let me intervene.
We need to think about a few things here.
We are currently only supporting EPSG 4326. This is likely only
because we have really not needed any other projection
revno: 1876
committer: Lars
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Sat 2010-07-24 17:40:31 +0200
message:
Applied patch from Namrata (partly) on validation in dataset module
modified:
dhis-2/dhis-web/dhis-web-maintenance/dhis-web-maintenance
revno: 1877
committer: Lars
branch nick: trunk
timestamp: Sat 2010-07-24 17:47:39 +0200
message:
Adding missing bean definition
modified:
dhis-2/dhis-web/dhis-web-maintenance/dhis-web-maintenance-dataset/src/main/resources/META-INF/
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 5:15 PM, Jason Pickering
wrote:
> Not sure really where this is headed, but I am not 100% sure I am
> comfortable with the direction of the conversation. Let me intervene.
>
> We need to think about a few things here.
>
> We are currently only supporting EPSG 4326. This is
Hi Jason
On 24 July 2010 15:25, Jason Pickering wrote:
> Hi Bob,
>
> I think this is indeed interesting, but is it really worth spending
> any time on? We currently have something that works, and for our 10
> million row database in Zambia it took a few hours to import. OK,
> fine, it took time,
7 matches
Mail list logo
