Thanks Saptarshi, this is very helpful.
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 6:23 PM, Saptarshi Purkayastha wrote:
> Hello DHIS users and devs,
>
> Apologies for the long email... Should have probably been multiple
> blogpost to reduce its length...
>
> I recently encountered a situation with a very large imp
Thank you again!
Yes mysql might be better or not in another environment. Specially if we
consider the number and sizes of files generated by your InnoDB settings.
There is some discussion about how mysql could be affected by filesystem at
http://serverfault.com/questions/29193/what-is-the-best-li
Thanks Saptarshi
I am among of many who runs large DHIS2 database on MySQL. I always think to
move back to PostgreSQL. This communication is of great enlightening to me.
Congratulations
Lungo
From: Saptarshi Purkayastha
To: DHIS 2 developers ;
dhis2-us...@
*PS: DO NOT COPY THESE AS IS IN YOUR PRODUCTION SYSTEM. THESE ARE SPECIFIC
TO MY DEVELOPER INSTALLATION*
Yes, these are on Windows and the results may or may not be different on
Linux.
The DHIS2 behavior would remain the same in its interaction with the
database, since we are using the Type4 JDBC
Wow! Weldone!
I do not have a huge database as yours. And yes I have migrated from MySQL
to postgreSQL because I felt that the DHIS community does not support
enough MySQL. Anyway getting back to your journey I must ask what means
tunned MySQL or tunned PostgreSQL? What you tune might dictate the
5 matches
Mail list logo
