Nayeem
I agree with your approach for those examples, although using the data
element aggregation type might not cater for all types of indicators (ref
for instance where numerator and denominator have different aggregation
types, or where one of them are some type of group membership count, or
in
Hi Calle
Hope you doing well.
You are correct in a sense of different analytics type may required for
indicator aggregation :-)
There are better and easy way to calculate. If you minutely look at my
earlier mail, probably you identify that, I have written to perform
aggregation according to aggre
Folks,
This has been repeated ad nauseam - as you say, most health indicators
should in general be calculated as sum(numerator)/sum(denominator), whether
it's aggregated in the time or in the geographic dimension. That is because
most aggregated data elements used to calculate indicators are count
Might be same behavior desires for totals as well.
Regards,
Nayeem Al Mifthah
Kindly ignore typos.
On Tue, 18 Sep 2018, 22:35 Nayeem Al Mifthah, wrote:
> Hi Lars and others
> I have commented on an old issue DHIS2-575 about the desired behaviour ...
>
> I think expected behavior should calculat
Hi Lars and others
I have commented on an old issue DHIS2-575 about the desired behaviour ...
I think expected behavior should calculate the element aggregation as per
aggregation type of that perticular data elements first and later calculate
the indicator. Example:
If number of patient visited
5 matches
Mail list logo
