gt;Parent() );
Regards
Stuart Tyler
Jon Evans wrote:
Hi Stuart,
The PNS router uses a proxy model of the board, and ITEM is the base class for
these proxy representations. See pns_item.h
You can get back to the BOARD_ITEM using Parent(), but you may not need to; the
geometry of tracks will be represent
algorithm computations. Help appreciated.
Regards
Stuart Tyler
Stuart Tyler wrote:
Ok, I have spent some time looking at the branch, getting it to compile and
understanding the multi-drag extension code. As you say this is not an
implementation, but a demo of the integration.
I have an algorithm impl
king local until
I hear something from the team, and I understand if this is not soon. I will
shout out if I work it out on my own.
Regards
Stuart Tyler
Stuart Tyler wrote:
Hi Tom,
Was a great catch up with the developers in Spain.
Thanks for prompting me about the below email and branch. I will ge
4:40 pm, Tomasz Wlostowski
wrote:
>On 18/07/2023 20:06, Stuart Tyler wrote:
>> Hi Jon,
>>
>> Thanks for the feedback. Yes, I agree with all your points. I started
>
>> off copying drag track but backed out of this as I got stuck
>accessing
>> the multiple
next couple of days. I think your comparison is correct - I will attempt to
follow its track movement and addition style - I now understand the algorithm
and what is needed at least.
Appreciate the pointer to looking at component dragger.
Regards
Stuart Tyler
Jon Evans wrote:
Hi Stuart,
Some
board->FinalizeBulkAdd( bulkAddedItems );
.. and later
newBoardItem->SetModified();
Can anyone spot the issue with my code and why I would not get a track
showing up?
Ta
Stuart
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 1:29:04 PM UTC+1 Stuart Tyler wrote:
> I have upda
corner cases that need
handling yet, but its probably useable once the track adds are fixed.
Ta
Stuart
On Saturday, July 15, 2023 at 12:22:49 AM UTC+1 Stuart Tyler wrote:
> Hi,
> I have been busy extending pcbnew to include multiple track dragging
> functionality. I have made some r
Hi,
I have been busy extending pcbnew to include multiple track dragging
functionality. I have made some reasonable progress in getting to
understanding the problem and learning new stuff in c++ since I last used
it, and lots of KiCad internals, and fun geometry.
Anyway my code is a mess, but m
ugLog(). (But I’m sure there’s a more automated way to do it.)
>
> On 8 Jul 2023, at 15:58, Stuart Tyler wrote:
>
> Thank you for the tip on setting the launch environment variable
> *KICAD_ALLOC_CONSOLE.
> *That worked. Now I can see printf() output.
>
> Jeff, I have b
Thank you for the tip on setting the launch environment variable
*KICAD_ALLOC_CONSOLE.
*That worked. Now I can see printf() output.
Jeff, I have been seeing the decorator stuff in the code. What is the
standard way of turning this on? I also see LOGs being used.
m_logger->Log(). I follow thi
o use pcbnew from the
command line?
Thanks
Stuart
On Monday, July 3, 2023 at 5:58:32 PM UTC+1 Stuart Tyler wrote:
> Thank you all for those pointers.
>
> I suspected as much, and so it looks like off to cpp land I go.
>
> Thank you Tomasz Wlostowski for the pointer into th
Thank you for the hints from various people. I deleted my original fork and
started again and it worked this time. I believe my merge request is in.
Thanks for helping me out.
Regards
Stuart
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 7:21:21 PM UTC+1 Stuart Tyler wrote:
> Thank you for the guidance. Be
thing to do. I think I found an issue,
and the solution, but what to do next - I have no idea.
Regards
Stuart
On Thursday, July 6, 2023 at 3:27:09 PM UTC+1 Stuart Tyler wrote:
> Hi,
> I have my KiCad Windows development system going and browsing my way
> through pcbnew, getting
Hi,
I have my KiCad Windows development system going and browsing my way
through pcbnew, getting up to speed on the internal workings of moving and
dragging.
I think I have observed an issue in moveIndividually, the ctrl-M command.
When you select multiple traces, the first trace is moved nicel
Thank you all for those pointers.
I suspected as much, and so it looks like off to cpp land I go.
Thank you Tomasz Wlostowski for the pointer into the code base where to
start looking for the implementation. Agree - I am only attempting "mark
collisions" mode. Personally I never use push/shove
Hi, this is my first ever post here. I am really impressed with the
development of KiCad over the past few releases. The python interface is
really good and I am keen to learn. I have been designing PCBs for a few
decades now and keen to help improve KiCad.
I have seen some discussion on suppor
16 matches
Mail list logo
