Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-23 Thread Klaas Freitag
On 22.03.2016 15:35, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:33 AM, Roeland Douma mailto:rull...@owncloud.com>> wrote: This is a bit of an oversimplification. Just cutting up a file does not work. You need a rolling checksum. Else you are going to be unable to detect move

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-22 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On dinsdag 22 maart 2016 11:31:39 CET Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Klaas Freitag > > wrote: > > On 21.03.2016 23:58, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > >> I can work on a proof of concept for large text files and virtual > >> machine images (wich wo

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-22 Thread Jos Poortvliet
On dinsdag 22 maart 2016 11:31:39 CET Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Klaas Freitag > > wrote: > > On 21.03.2016 23:58, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > >> I can work on a proof of concept for large text files and virtual > >> machine images (wich wo

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-22 Thread Roeland Douma
: Sent: 22-3-2016 15:16 Subject: Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync On 21.03.2016 23:58, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > Hi, > > I can work on a proof of concept for large text files and virtual > machine images (wich would already be a win-situation for some

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-22 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
; > I agree that the blog series is a good place to start on how to design the > API. > > Cheers, > --Roeland > > * From: * Klaas Freitag > * To: * > * Sent: * 22-3-2016 15:16 > * Subject: * Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync > > On 21.03.2016

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-22 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:16 AM, Klaas Freitag wrote: > On 21.03.2016 23:58, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > >> >> > Hi, > > >> I can work on a proof of concept for large text files and virtual >> machine images (wich would already be a win-situation for some users) >> and then focus on *some* of the h

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-22 Thread Klaas Freitag
On 21.03.2016 23:58, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: Hi, I can work on a proof of concept for large text files and virtual machine images (wich would already be a win-situation for some users) and then focus on *some* of the hard to sync files (like powerpoint presentations) and see what I could get

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-21 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:28 PM, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Klaas Freitag > wrote: > >> On 15.03.2016 19:56, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: >> Hi Tomaz, >> >> first, thanks for your proposal, sounds interesting. >> >> I think its way to ambitious, as stuff is complicat

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-21 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 6:22 PM, Klaas Freitag wrote: > On 15.03.2016 19:56, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: > Hi Tomaz, > > first, thanks for your proposal, sounds interesting. > > I think its way to ambitious, as stuff is complicated, but well, go for it > :) > > Me and my collegues from the client team

Re: [owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-21 Thread Klaas Freitag
On 15.03.2016 19:56, Tomaz Canabrava wrote: Hi Tomaz, first, thanks for your proposal, sounds interesting. I think its way to ambitious, as stuff is complicated, but well, go for it :) Me and my collegues from the client team are willing to help you and mentor if you want. Please, as a fir

[owncloud-devel] GSoC Proposal for Large File Sync

2016-03-15 Thread Tomaz Canabrava
Hello Owncloudians, I'm Tomaz Canabrava, student of Computer Science in the Federal Institute of São Paulo and a long time KDE Contributor. I Wanna try to apply for GSoC doing the Large File Sync on Owncloud - below is my proposal. I understand that there is the "two patches rule" to be part of