f the
> > above (just the same syscalls in loop, nothing fancier) and do
> > time-stamped strace?
>
> Could you also add a printk of what ->__mnt_writers was at the time of
> the WARN_ON()? That will hopefully at least tell us whether we're
> looking at a real
Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
This usually saves one recompile to insert similar printk like below. :)
Sample nastygram:
looks very useful to me!
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@openvz.org
https://openvz.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:55:57 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There is nice 2 byte hole after struct task_struct::ioprio field
> into which we can put two 1-byte fields: ->fpu_counter and
> ->oomkilladj.
>
> [cc'ing Arjan just in case ->fpu_counter placement wasn't completely
>
On Mon, 1 Oct 2007 16:15:53 +0400
Alexey Dobriyan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Save ~650 bytes here.
>
> add/remove: 4/0 grow/shrink: 0/7 up/down: 430/-1088 (-658)
> function old new delta
> __copy_fs_struct - 202+202
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 18:08:32 +0400
Kirill Korotaev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some gcc versions (I checked at least 4.1.1 from RHEL5 & 4.1.2 from
> gentoo) can generate incorrect code with read_crX()/write_crX()
> functions mix up, due to cached results of read_crX().
>
I'm not so sure volatil
On Sat, 01 Dec 2007 15:21:12 -0500
Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Sure. We keep the updated dev_get_by_ that takes a network
> > namespace parameter.
> ..
>
> And what should code be passing in when "# CON
On Mon, 03 Dec 2007 09:24:15 +0100
Romano Giannetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 2007-12-01 at 22:34 -0500, Mark Lord wrote:
> > Stephen Hemminger wrote:.
> > >>
> > > I spoke too soon earlier, ndiswrapper builds and loads against
> > > current 2.6.24-rc3. Vmware and proprietary VPN
y atrociously bad idea.
>
> We already have a syscall layer which is painful to thunk in places,
> and this would make it much worse.
>
syscalls are cheap as well.
cheaper than decades of dealing with such multiplexer mess ;/
--
Arjan van de VenIntel Open Source Technology Cent
On 2/9/2011 7:04 PM, Matt Helsley wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 08, 2011 at 05:05:41PM -0800, jacob.jun@linux.intel.com wrote:
>> From: Jacob Pan
>>
>> Freezer subsystem is used to manage batch jobs which can start
>> stop at the same time. However, sometime it is desirable to let
>> the kernel manage t
On 2/13/2011 4:44 PM, KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki wrote:
> On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 15:29:07 -0800
> Matt Helsley wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 11:10:44AM -0800, jacob.jun@linux.intel.com
>> wrote:
>>> From: Jacob Pan
>>>
>>> Freezer subsystem is used to manage batch jobs which can start
>>> stop at t
On 11/28/2011 3:42 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-28 at 12:03 +0300, Andrew Vagin wrote:
>> This tracepoint shows how long a task is sleeping in uninterruptible state.
>>
>> E.g.
>> It may show how long and where a mutex is waited.
>
> Fair enough, makes one wonder how much it would t
>
> perf_evlist is what you call perf_bundle and perf_evsel is what you call
> perf_event in powertop.
>
> That part of the API should be ok for wider use and is in fact exported
> in the python binding.
I don't care about the snake language.
frankly all that's missing is a "safe" accessor libr
12 matches
Mail list logo
