From: "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 17:34:59 +0300
> You are perfectly correct and the place in addrconf_cleanup is that
> place when we believe that we should destroy all the staff.
>
> You see, it is pretty useless to call addrconf_ifdown(dev, 2) after
> addrconf_d
On Sun, 2008-03-23 at 03:17 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:13:16 +0300
>
> > First, this behaviour is broken for a namespace right now in the 2.6.26
> > tree. inet6_dev pointer will be NULL for a loopback inside the
> > namespace
From: "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2008 11:13:16 +0300
> First, this behaviour is broken for a namespace right now in the 2.6.26
> tree. inet6_dev pointer will be NULL for a loopback inside the
> namespace. The case is simple. Just remove all INET6 addresses from a
> loop
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 17:38 -0700, David Miller wrote:
> From: "Denis V. Lunev" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 17:35:23 +0300
>
> > addrconf_ifdown is broken in respect to the usage of how parameter. This
> > function is called with (event != NETDEV_DOWN) and (2) on the IPv6 stop.
>
