Re: ntpsec | solve #714, #737 by removing ill-conceived test. (!1270)

2022-05-14 Thread jamesb...@jamesb192.com jamesb192--- via devel
> On 05/14/2022 9:42 PM Hal Murray via devel wrote: > > > > Not yet in the delvel emailarchives: What distro is broken by this? > > I've only seen it on FreeBSD. It's in the development branch and will be in > 13.1 which will be released in a few days. > > It's in clang. Unless FreeBSD has

Re: ntpsec | solve #714, #737 by removing ill-conceived test. (!1270)

2022-05-14 Thread jamesb...@jamesb192.com jamesb192--- via devel
> On 05/14/2022 8:53 PM Gary E. Miller via devel wrote: > > > Yo Hal! > > On Sat, 14 May 2022 17:42:59 -0700 > Hal Murray via devel wrote: > > > I'm cc-ing devel so this doesn't get lost on gitlab. Let's move the > > discussion real email.. > > > > > > > include/ntp_fp.h:58 defines l_fp

Re: ntpsec | solve #714, #737 by removing ill-conceived test. (!1270)

2022-05-14 Thread jamesb...@jamesb192.com jamesb192--- via devel
> On 05/14/2022 8:42 PM Hal Murray via devel wrote: > > > I'm cc-ing devel so this doesn't get lost on gitlab. Let's move the > discussion real email.. > > > > include/ntp_fp.h:58 defines l_fp as a uint64_4, I can find no current > > contrary definitions. > > We need to make a cleanup pas