On 13/09/2016 16:25, Eric S. Raymond wrote:
Not a crazy idea, but I lean against it. My problem is that threading is a
serious defect attractor (as we have in fact seen in the async-DNS code).
I would not tar all threading architectures and designs with the
async-DNS threading code brush. Look
On 26/03/2016 8:05 AM, Amar Takhar wrote:
On 2016-03-25 13:51 -0700, Hal Murray wrote:
So, ntpd 0.9.2-afceec0+
I'd put the + right after the 2:
ntpd 0.9.2+afceec0 or ntpd 0.9.2+ if you build without git.
My normal mode of operation is to have a master copy on one system, rsync to
other sys
On 13/05/2016 07:37, Gary E. Miller wrote:
It would be insane for a switch to have EEE enabled without a way to
turn it off, so you likely have never seen it turned on.
The switch should only enable EEE if the PHY says it is ok. If you
disable it in the PHY and switch should honour it. A PHY
On 13/05/2016 15:36, Gary E. Miller wrote:
On Fri, 13 May 2016 10:46:05 +1000
Chris Johns wrote:
On 13/05/2016 07:37, Gary E. Miller wrote:
It would be insane for a switch to have EEE enabled without a way to
turn it off, so you likely have never seen it turned on.
The switch should only
