The Ubuntu 16 04 "cross-build" job is busted and I have no idea how to
fix it. I thought one idea behind the "build-cross-armhf" job was that
"cross-build" would have gone away.
Will someone who may address this please do so?
-30-
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message p
Yo James!
On Sat, 07 Sep 2024 10:14:57 -0700
James Browning via devel wrote:
> The Ubuntu 16 04 "cross-build" job is busted and I have no idea how
> to fix it. I thought one idea behind the "build-cross-armhf" job was
> that "cross-build" would have gone away.
I have no idea about Ubuntu or cro
I assume it's from this change:
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/commit/7c8b5fe20eafe911be4eac64467a032a52753313#887b5ad6972aa02f9a0434c248cd872a994e6fc5_44_41
Ubuntu 16.04 is pretty old, does it need to be supported?
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntps
> I assume it's from this change: https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/commit/
> 7c8b5fe20eafe911be4eac64467a032a52753313#887b5ad6972aa02f9a0434c248cd872a9
> 94e6fc5_44_41
Thanks. Yes. That would explain this problem.
But that cleanup went in back in June. Why didn't we notice this problem
ear
On 09/07/2024 3:49 PM PDT Hal Murray via devel wrote:
I assume it's from this change: https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/commit/
7c8b5fe20eafe911be4eac64467a032a52753313#887b5ad6972aa0
Thanks
James said:
>It is one of many jobs set up to fail withou fanfare. Nobody was
>checking up on them on the pipelines tab at GitLab.
Why do we have those jobs?
>> Do we have a web page that describes our support policy?
>Besides https://www.ntpsec.org/supported-platforms.ht
> some twenty one of them build docker images weekly,
Does anybody test them?
Who gets the output of weekly builds?
> Which of these jobs should become noisy and which ones should go away?
If we are going to run a job, somebody should check the results. So I
vote that all are noisy. If we