Really really dead? Or maybe just hiding in some dark corner?
Should we drop support for python2 as part of the next release?
Or announce in the next release that we will drop it as part of the following
release?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
Yo Hal!
On Mon, 04 Sep 2023 14:15:26 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Really really dead? Or maybe just hiding in some dark corner?
Rumours of its death are greatly exagerated.
> Should we drop support for python2 as part of the next release?
> Or announce in the next release that we will
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:25:46PM -0700, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> From RHEL:
>
> "The RHEL 8 AppStream Lifecycle Page puts the end date of RHEL 8's
> Python 2.7 package at June 2024."
>
> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4455511
Hi Gary,
Is the implication that we can safely drop
On Sep 4, 2023 14:46, Matthew Selsky via devel wrote:On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:25:46PM -0700, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> From RHEL:
>
> "The RHEL 8 AppStream Lifecycle Page puts the end date of RHEL 8's
> Python 2.7 package at June 2024."
>
> https://access.redhat.com/solutions/4
> Rumours of its death are greatly exagerated.
Thanks.
Let me try again with maybe closer to what I should have asked?
Are there any distros that we currently run on that don't support python 3?
I can imagine some places are running really really old software.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it
Yo Hal!
On Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:46:45 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > Rumours of its death are greatly exagerated.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Let me try again with maybe closer to what I should have asked?
>
> Are there any distros that we currently run on that don't support
> python 3?
RHEL.
>
Yo James!
On Mon, 04 Sep 2023 15:38:26 -0700
James Browning via devel wrote:
> > By dropping 2.7 we could probably assume secrets which simplifies
> > ntpkeygen, simplify ntp.poly, be able to drop the now oldoldstable?
> > runner testing for asciidoc on python 2 support, and also have the
> > op
Yo Matthew!
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 21:46:50 +
Matthew Selsky wrote:
> Is the implication that we can safely drop python2 support after June
> 2024?
Maybe. RHEL, and friends, are the last to drop things. Worse, people
that use RHEL, and friends, seem to never update their systems...
> Are the
Gary said:
> Let's try again in a year.
Sounds good to me.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2023-09-04 17:38, James Browning via devel wrote:
On Sep 4, 2023 14:46, Matthew Selsky via devel wrote:
On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 02:25:46PM -0700, Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
> From RHEL:
>
> "The RHEL 8 AppStream Lifecycle Page puts the end date of RHEL 8's
> Pyt
Yo Richard!
On Mon, 4 Sep 2023 19:24:22 -0500
Richard Laager via devel wrote:
> Dropping support for Python 2 should allow for dropping most of the
> poly infrastructure. That code (pylib/poly.py) involves some
> contortions (see also [1]) to make it possible to run on both Python
> 2 and Python
11 matches
Mail list logo