k...@roeckx.be said:
> TLS 1.2 got added in 1.0.1, which was released in 2012. I'm guessing there
> are some old redhat versions that are still supported running something
> older, like 0.9.8.
Thanks.
I think I've figured out what was going on. I was testing with self-signed
certificates and
On 10/26/19 10:24 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> That approach is worth investigating, but it adds a layer of complexity if
> you
> want to support more than a single reader.
Are multiple readers a thing? What's the use case here? I mean,
presumably I'm not running multiple ntpds on the same s
> Are multiple readers a thing? What's the use case here? I mean, presumably
> I'm not running multiple ntpds on the same system, right?
The idea is to be able to run shmmon without stopping ntpd.
The other half of making the read side of SHM read only is that is cleans up
the file protection
On 10/28/19 3:37 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
>
>> Are multiple readers a thing? What's the use case here? I mean, presumably
>> I'm not running multiple ntpds on the same system, right?
>
> The idea is to be able to run shmmon without stopping ntpd.
That makes sense. Thanks!
> The other half of maki
