Not straightforwardly, but the change you originally proposed months ago
when you first observed this bug was correct AFAICT.
On Aug 24, 2016 8:10 PM, "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Daniel Franke :
> > On 8/24/16, Hal Murray wrote:
> > > That's the easy part. First we have to understand the code a
Daniel Franke :
> On 8/24/16, Hal Murray wrote:
> > That's the easy part. First we have to understand the code and find the
> > bug.
>
> It should already be fixed in my branch. If you wanted to unfix it, at
> ntp_proto.c:415 change MDF_ACAST to (MDF_ACAST | MDF_POOL).
OK, that's good news.
Do
Hal Murray :
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > Fixing the pool/nopeer bug will have to be done twice unless we land
> > Daniel's protocol-machine refactoring. Might have to be done *three* times
> > if his redesign of the access-control options requires it.
>
> That's the easy part. First we have
On 8/24/16, Hal Murray wrote:
> That's the easy part. First we have to understand the code and find the
> bug.
It should already be fixed in my branch. If you wanted to unfix it, at
ntp_proto.c:415 change MDF_ACAST to (MDF_ACAST | MDF_POOL).
___
devel
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> Fixing the pool/nopeer bug will have to be done twice unless we land
> Daniel's protocol-machine refactoring. Might have to be done *three* times
> if his redesign of the access-control options requires it.
That's the easy part. First we have to understand the code and
Yo Eric!
On Wed, 24 Aug 2016 08:30:01 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Conclusion: TESTFRAME just went from "we need it someday" to
> critical-path. Well, we were preparing for another swing at it anyway.
+1. And now that you are getting a gut feel for what ntpd does from
the ntpviz and Pi pro
Copying Mark and devel, everyone should know about the task dependencies.
Hal Murray :
> I think [the fact that the pool keyword can't combine with nopeer is] a bug.
>
> It should be reasonable to find, but may take a while to learn that chunk of
> code.
You are in a maze of twisty little depen
