Yo Hal!
On Wed, 28 Aug 2019 12:56:33 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> ianbru...@gmail.com said:
> > It is reducing unnecessary globals because globals are a good thing
> > to reduce.
>
> In general, I agree that reducing globals is a good idea. It's not
> globals that are evil, it's the c
Thanks.
Ahh... Part of the problem is that I misread the diffs. I didn't notice that
the additions were procedures. I thought it was restoring the individual
counters.
ianbru...@gmail.com said:
> It is reducing unnecessary globals because globals are a good thing to
> reduce.
In general,
On 8/28/19 1:26 PM, Hal Murray wrote:
Merge Request !1026 was merged
The Subject says "Converted stat_count struct to a module level global"
The code looks like it is un-struct-ing things.
Was that "a module level global" supposed to be "module level globals"?
!1026 moves the variables fro
Merge Request !1026 was merged
The Subject says "Converted stat_count struct to a module level global"
The code looks like it is un-struct-ing things.
Was that "a module level global" supposed to be "module level globals"?
What's the policy on this area? I thought the general idea was to put t
