James Browning via devel :
> I have a branch 'control-denum' which takes a significantly wrong
> approach and replaces many of the #define directives and replaces
> them with a trio of enums. completely untested of course. IMO a
> slightly less wrong solution might be to extend the table to have
>
On 2/19/19, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote:
> Hal Murray :
>> The thing that gripes me about ntp_control is that for each of the tables
>>
>> mentioned above, there are actually 3 parallel tables and they are a long
>> way
>> apart so a pain to update. Maybe if we just interlaces the #defines wi
