>> Is that a bug or feature?
> I think it is a bug, but that is this years fashion.
Do we fix it, or document it?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tuesday, March 18, 2025 3:10:58 PM Pacific Daylight Time Gary E. Miller via
devel wrote:
> Yo James!
:::snip:::
>
> And who or what changes the symlink? When? Why? Documented?
The individual user who should not change the symlink probably will.
They should never unless the waf-2.1.4 compa
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:28:17 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> I don't use PYTHONPATH
>
> The old waf used to install python libraries in /usr/local/lib64/
> The new waf now installs things in /usr/loca/lib/
>
> Is that a bug or feature?
I think it is a bug, but that is this years f
James said:
>There is no magic, no fancy Python tricks. When you run waf or
>waf-2.1.4 you get new behavior. waf-2.0.25 gets you new behavior
>closer to the old behavior.
Why do we still have the old waf? Do we need directions on when/how to
use it?
There is a note in NEWS, but
Yo James!
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 14:21:57 -0700
James Browning via devel wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2025 13:44, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > I tried to bisect the git. No luck. The issue depends on which
> > Python I am running.
>
> commit e899c2ffd4243e933150f2349874e4e462657c54
> Author: James Br
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 15:03:34 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> >> Is that a bug or feature?
> > I think it is a bug, but that is this years fashion.
>
> Do we fix it, or document it?
Sadly every distro is different. And the distros are changing rapidly
due to pressure from Pottering. No
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:44:46 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > I tried to bisect the git. No luck. The issue depends on which
> > Python I am running.
>
> commit e899c2ffd4243e933150f2349874e4e462657c54
> Author: James Browning
> Date: Thu Mar 13 02:06:11 2025 -0700
>
> Use waf 2.
On Mar 18, 2025 13:44, Hal Murray via devel wrote:> I tried to bisect the git. No luck. The issue depends on which Python I> am running.commit e899c2ffd4243e933150f2349874e4e462657c54Author: James Browning Date: Thu Mar 13 02:06:11 2025 -0700 Use waf 2.1.4, revise, and drop Py2.6 builds.Whi
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 18 Mar 2025 01:59:54 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> There is also dist-packages vs site-packages on Debian
>
> The old waf used dist-packages
> The new waf uses site-packages (like Fedora)
dist-packages is for system (distribution) unstalled packages
site-packages is for u
> I tried to bisect the git. No luck. The issue depends on which Python I
> am running.
commit e899c2ffd4243e933150f2349874e4e462657c54
Author: James Browning
Date: Thu Mar 13 02:06:11 2025 -0700
Use waf 2.1.4, revise, and drop Py2.6 builds.
Which python works the old way?
We now ha
Yo Hal!
I tried to bisect the git. No luck. The issue depends on which
Python I am running.
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
There is also dist-packages vs site-packages on Debian
The old waf used dist-packages
The new waf uses site-packages (like Fedora)
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/list
I don't use PYTHONPATH
The old waf used to install python libraries in /usr/local/lib64/
The new waf now installs things in /usr/loca/lib/
Is that a bug or feature?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
h
13 matches
Mail list logo
