Re: l_fp access macros (was: DCF77 driver seems to be broken)

2017-02-22 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Achim Gratz : > Just out of curiosity, why have you defined the l_fp access macros in > such an overly redundant manner? I realize that the compiler will > optimize most of that away, but it seems odd to do that in the first > place unless you're expecting to support a platform that has a > non-co

l_fp access macros (was: DCF77 driver seems to be broken)

2017-02-22 Thread Achim Gratz
Just out of curiosity, why have you defined the l_fp access macros in such an overly redundant manner? I realize that the compiler will optimize most of that away, but it seems odd to do that in the first place unless you're expecting to support a platform that has a non-conforming compiler that d