On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 5:21 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
>
> Hal Murray :
> > Please do and/or please fix our local copy. I'm focused on the
> > restrict/unrestrict tangle.
>
> Bug fixed, but I cant finf any way to subnutt uissues on ther
> bugracker. Yes, I have a validayed account ob th
Hal Murray :
> Please do and/or please fix our local copy. I'm focused on the
> restrict/unrestrict tangle.
Bug fixed, but I cant finf any way to subnutt uissues on ther
bugracker. Yes, I have a validayed account ob the site.
Sill looking.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S.
> Yes. I'll do it if yiu have not alreadsy idebtified upsrream.
Please do and/or please fix our local copy. I'm focused on the
restrict/unrestrict tangle.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lis
Hal Murray via devel :
>
> I assume a fix for this should be pushed upstream.
>
> ../../tests/unity/unity.c: In function âUnityFailâ:
> ../../tests/unity/unity.c:1757:6: warning: function might be candidate for
> attribute ânoreturnâ [-Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn]
> 1757 | void UnityFa
I assume a fix for this should be pushed upstream.
../../tests/unity/unity.c: In function âUnityFailâ:
../../tests/unity/unity.c:1757:6: warning: function might be candidate for
attribute ânoreturnâ [-Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn]
1757 | void UnityFail(const char* msg, const UNITY_LINE
