Re: Replay branch.

2016-05-03 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Amar Takhar : > Before I start pushing some of the major changes to make the 'replay' branch > happen I need a few questions answered: > > - Is it easier to edit the source for renamed defines to match current or >should I add compat shims. > - Will the

Re: Replay branch.

2016-05-03 Thread Eric S. Raymond
Amar Takhar : > I'm confused at the first commit for the replay branch. I was expecting it > to > be after the first conversion of the repository. > > Is there a reason that 69ddfd9 was used? Can't say, I can't find that hash. What was the commit summary lin

Re: Replay branch.

2016-05-03 Thread Amar Takhar
Before I start pushing some of the major changes to make the 'replay' branch happen I need a few questions answered: - Is it easier to edit the source for renamed defines to match current or should I add compat shims. - Will the source layout change almost immediately to match

Replay branch.

2016-05-02 Thread Amar Takhar
I'm confused at the first commit for the replay branch. I was expecting it to be after the first conversion of the repository. Is there a reason that 69ddfd9 was used? Amar. ___ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/ma