On Wednesday, March 26, 2025 11:09:51 AM Pacific Daylight Time Hal Murray
wrote:
> If somebody is still using Python 2, do they have to manually fix the link
> from waf to point to the old waf? Or is there some magic that takes care
> of that?
THERE IS NO MAGIC HERE, nor any fancy Python tricks.
On Monday, March 24, 2025 3:12:44 PM Pacific Daylight Time Hal Murray via devel
wrote:
> What's the story on new waf install directories vs old waf directories?
The pylib/wscript has been changed so that the egg-info, and all .py files in
pylib are installed in PYTHONDIR (see MR 1450)
TLDR PYTH
If somebody is still using Python 2, do they have to manually fix the link
from waf to point to the old waf? Or is there some magic that takes care
of that?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://l
On Wednesday, March 26, 2025 12:25:34 PM Pacific Daylight Time Hal Murray
wrote:
> > Python 2.7 works with either version of waf.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Why are we keeping the old version?
Paranoia, I figured that if I removed it there would be a high chance something
would go wrong and I would be re
> Python 2.7 works with either version of waf.
Thanks.
Why are we keeping the old version?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Monday, March 24, 2025 8:25:10 PM Pacific Daylight Time you wrote:
> > The code has changed, behavior is not noticeably different than it was
> > before.
> Didn't it change from dist-packages to site-packages on Debian and friends?
Yes, it does due to upstream waf and/or Python changes.
Accord
> The code has changed, behavior is not noticeably different than it was before.
Didn't it change from dist-packages to site-packages on Debian and friends?
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
https://lis
