On 21/09/2018 1:58 PM, Sanjeev Gupta via devel wrote:
Yes, having a sentence ...
The change in the value of the residual, after 2 hours or 35
iterations, should not exceed 23
ppm is a requirement of various standards, among which are NIST 543:62
and FIPS
180 published in 2017.
... is slig
On 9/21/2018 10:58 AM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
Yes, having a sentence ...
The change in the value of the residual, after 2 hours or 35
iterations, should not exceed 23
ppm is a requirement of various standards, among which are NIST 543:62
and FIPS
180 published in 2017.
... is slightly confusin
On Sat, Sep 22, 2018 at 12:54 AM Paul Theodoropoulos
wrote:
> On 9/21/2018 1:07 AM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
>
> My concern is that the space between "25" and "kg" should be
> non-breaking. Else, readability suffers badly. How do you do this in
> asciidoc?
>
>
> By non-breakingI assume you mean
On 9/21/2018 1:07 AM, Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
Paul,
Personally, I find 25kg, 50ppm, 3m, more readable; but that is neither
here nor there.
I also prefer 'conjoined' value plus unit. It's a choice, not a law, but
I'm willing to conform to
an objective resource in high standing (NIST) if that's w
On Fri, Sep 21, 2018, 1:07 AM Sanjeev Gupta via devel
wrote:
> Paul,
>
> Personally, I find 25kg, 50ppm, 3m, more readable; but that is neither
> here nor there.
>
> My concern is that the space between "25" and "kg" should be
> non-breaking. Else, readability suffers badly. How do you do this
Paul,
Personally, I find 25kg, 50ppm, 3m, more readable; but that is neither here
nor there.
My concern is that the space between "25" and "kg" should be non-breaking.
Else, readability suffers badly. How do you do this in asciidoc?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/
Paul Theodoropoulos via devel :
> Uniformity of presentation seems like a desireable goal - are there any
> objections to following these particular guidelines?
Not fro me. Go to it.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineeri
