Yo Hal!
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 20:21:20 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Gary said:
> > Then hang it off another switch.
>
> Care to suggest "another switch"?
Nope. I just turn them all on. Ask someone that cares.
> > but it does burn out SD cards quickly.
>
> From my initial message:
Gary said:
> Then hang it off another switch.
Care to suggest "another switch"?
> but it does burn out SD cards quickly.
>From my initial message:
They are all very low volume
I was close to saying they all happened only during initialization, but at
least one is termination, and I think
Yo Hal!
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 19:49:18 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Gary said:
> > Sorry, I misread that. Some people want verbose logging, some
> > none. Choice is good. As long as there is an on/off switch of some
> > sort.
>
> Yes and no.
>
> The on/off switch is obscure enough an
Gary said:
> Sorry, I misread that. Some people want verbose logging, some none. Choice
> is good. As long as there is an on/off switch of some sort.
Yes and no.
The on/off switch is obscure enough and the amount of logging that can be
turned on/off is small enough that the choice isn't wor
Yo Hal!
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:49:18 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Gary said:
> >> They are all very low volume that are useful for debugging,
> >> especially when somebody asks for help on users@ or devel@
>
> > Why remove something you think is useful?
>
> Ahh/oops.
>
> I didn't
Gary said:
>> They are all very low volume that are useful for debugging,
>> especially when somebody asks for help on users@ or devel@
> Why remove something you think is useful?
Ahh/oops.
I didn't want to remove the messages, just remove the LOGIF wrapper so the
messages would always appea
Yo Hal!
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 18:37:50 -0700
Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Anybody object if I remove it?
Well, you also said:
> They are all very low volume that are useful for debugging,
> especially when somebody asks for help on users@ or devel@
Why remove something you think is useful?
I'
