e...@thyrsus.com said:
>> OCXOs are big, power hungry, and expensive. Why do you want one?
> To minimize drift during loss of sat lock, of course.
Do you have any idea how big a can of worms you are opening?
Low end OCXOs will double the cost of Pi type setup. Good ones cost a lot
more.
How
Hal Murray :
> OCXOs are big, power hungry, and expensive. Why do you want one?
To minimize drift during loss of sat lock, of course.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.nt
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> The deal we've struck with them is: They supply the hardware, we'll do the
> software integration. I think they're our best bet for a real single-board
> solution.
I don't think we want a single board solution. It won't track new versions
with newer CPU chips, or if i
Hal Murray :
> > Not immediately; there's still the Odroid C2 and BeagleBone to do.
>
> Forget them. They aren't worth your time.
I already have the Odroid, and Mark asked me to support it at Penguicon.
You can ask him why he thinks it's important; I remember that he gave
me some reasons, but le
> Not immediately; there's still the Odroid C2 and BeagleBone to do.
Forget them. They aren't worth your time.
There aren't any HAT equivalents for BeagleBone and the Odroid web site is
broken enough that I couldn't even order one.
---
There is actually a Cape with GPS but it also has GPR
Hal Murray :
> I like it. The disadvantage is that you may need some adapters. Has the
> world switched to HDMI yet? (I'm still using VGA and PS2, but I have USB
> keyboards.)
There's a lot of both HDMI and DVI out there. New monitors tend to have both
jacks. I believe VGA is in sharp decline
Hal Murray :
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > Now that I'm thinking about it - probably the NTPsec site should have a
> > HOWTOs category, and both this thing and both time-service HOWTOs should
> > move there. Later to be joined by others.
>
> I like that suggestion.
>
> It seems like the fastest wa
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> Now that I'm thinking about it - probably the NTPsec site should have a
> HOWTOs category, and both this thing and both time-service HOWTOs should
> move there. Later to be joined by others.
> But I'm not wedded to that plan. Do you have a better or different idea?
I li
Hal Murray :
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > Would it suffice to say "Never put a Pi on an un-NATted address until you
> > have removed the default account?"
>
> I don't think that's quite good enough.
It's OK, I think I have a better solution now.
> What are your longer term plans for this docu
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> There's a simpler way. First step becomes changing the default-user
> password using a local display and keyboard, *before* the Ethernet is
> plugged in.
I like it. The disadvantage is that you may need some adapters. Has the
world switched to HDMI yet? (I'm still us
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> Would it suffice to say "Never put a Pi on an un-NATted address until you
> have removed the default account?"
I don't think that's quite good enough.
What are your longer term plans for this document? Is it going to live on
www.catb.org forever, or migrate to someplac
Yo Kurt!
On Tue, 24 May 2016 23:45:39 +0200
Kurt Roeckx wrote:
> > > Would it suffice to say "Never put a Pi on an un-NATted address
> > > until you have removed the default account?"
> >
> > Most people's NATs leak a lot. Or they have IPv6 end around.
> >
> > Just change the password, to a
Kurt Roeckx :
> Can I just suggest that you don't allow password based logins over
> the network?
./clockmaker --secure makes that change.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://list
On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 02:38:23PM -0700, Gary E. Miller wrote:
> Yo Eric!
>
> On Tue, 24 May 2016 17:33:06 -0400
> "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
>
> > Hal Murray :
> > >
> > > e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > > > See my reply to Gary and your text about NATs and firewalls.
> > > > Nobody has convinced
Yo Eric!
On Tue, 24 May 2016 17:33:06 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Hal Murray :
> >
> > e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > > See my reply to Gary and your text about NATs and firewalls.
> > > Nobody has convinced me that this procedure *isn't* taking
> > > security seriously, nor will they until
Hal Murray :
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > See my reply to Gary and your text about NATs and firewalls. Nobody has
> > convinced me that this procedure *isn't* taking security seriously, nor will
> > they until I understand how any machine other than the one I port-forward to
> > is visible to o
16 matches
Mail list logo
