Re: Bogus results from NMEA/WNRO tangle

2022-01-31 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Hal! On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 22:19:15 -0800 Hal Murray wrote: > > I handle the regressions in gpsd so no need to fix them up. They > > have always had a line: > > Good. But that doesn't get the refclock drivers in ntpd. I've been > discussing refclock_nmea. > > > So that is two roll overs,

Re: Bogus results from NMEA/WNRO tangle

2022-01-30 Thread Hal Murray via devel
> I handle the regressions in gpsd so no need to fix them up. They have always > had a line: Good. But that doesn't get the refclock drivers in ntpd. I've been discussing refclock_nmea. > So that is two roll overs, so far.. Right. But only one pivot date. >> Things like WNRO fixup can b

Re: Bogus results from NMEA/WNRO tangle

2022-01-28 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Hal! On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 19:05:17 -0800 Hal Murray wrote: > Thanks. > > Gary said: > >> We need 2 pivot dates, one for the 2 digit year fixup, another for > >> the WNRO fixup. > > > More than 2, as WKRO happens every 1024 weeks. > > I don't understand how you are counting. I see one p

Re: Bogus results from NMEA/WNRO tangle

2022-01-28 Thread Hal Murray via devel
Thanks. Gary said: >> We need 2 pivot dates, one for the 2 digit year fixup, another for >> the WNRO fixup. > More than 2, as WKRO happens every 1024 weeks. I don't understand how you are counting. I see one pivot date for WNRO. The fixup may have to take multiple steps but there is only on

Re: Bogus results from NMEA/WNRO tangle

2022-01-26 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Hal! Sorry for the dealy, my inbox got full. On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 22:41:36 -0800 Hal Murray via devel wrote: > I think I've figured out what was going on. There are 2 stages of > fixup. One is for the 2 digit year. The other is for the WNRO. The > trick is that the year fixup has to let