On 01/08/2018 03:55 PM, Matthew Selsky wrote:
report -m shows exactly which lines are missing coverage.
Ah, thanks.
We should be able to use that information to get our python test coverage to
100%.
Agreed.
--
/"In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave? Money? Power? No. A
Man Ch
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 11:37:15AM -0500, Matthew Selsky wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 08:17:18AM -0600, Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
> >
> > How can I get a detailed report on the new python test coverage check? And
> > how
> > robust is it: does it only count the percentage of functions teste
On Fri, Jan 05, 2018 at 08:17:18AM -0600, Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
>
> How can I get a detailed report on the new python test coverage check? And how
> robust is it: does it only count the percentage of functions tested, or can it
> tell what parts of a function are being exercised?
>
> 91% is
How can I get a detailed report on the new python test coverage check?
And how robust is it: does it only count the percentage of functions
tested, or can it tell what parts of a function are being exercised?
91% is higher than I expected.
--
/"In the end; what separates a Man, from a Sl
