Re: Name clash

2018-02-17 Thread Achim Gratz via devel
Hal Murray via devel writes: > What's going to happen if a distro packages up our stuff and somebody > wants to install both our code and ntp classic? Well if a distro packages both NTP classic and NTPsec, then they would either: 1) Mark them in their repos as mutually incompatible so you can ins

Re: Name clash

2018-02-16 Thread Eric S. Raymond via devel
ernatives" in which case the package system has logic to prevent them from being installed at the same time. the ntpsec-vs-Classic name clash is not even a particularly exceptional situation - there gave been forks of base utilities before. There are, for example, a couple of different implementar

Re: Name clash

2018-02-16 Thread Sanjeev Gupta via devel
> That works only because we install in /usr/local/ while the system version of > ntp classic gets installed in /usr/ What's going to happen if a distro > packages up our stuff and somebody wants to install both our code and ntp > classic? For a distro, like Debian, the new package would be calle

Name clash

2018-02-16 Thread Hal Murray via devel
We have ntpd and ntpq that replace the programs with the same names from ntp classic. For testing, we install in /usr/local/ so we don't conflict with a system version of ntp classic. If you hack your search path, you get our code rather than the system programs with the same names. That wor