devel@ntpsec.org said:
> I thought that was still under some discussion when we shipped. Remind me
> what the patch was?
I got the impression that you pretty much vetoed it and/or weren't interested
in more discussion. I could easily have misread whatever you said.
I think we should dump long
Hal Murray :
>
> > Remember, without this patches we still have support for the *current* Mac
> > OS X, just not far back into older ones. I think that is a sufficient
> > gesture for our purposes.
>
> > Opinions of other solicited.
>
> We decided not to put in a trivial patch that would make
> Remember, without this patches we still have support for the *current* Mac
> OS X, just not far back into older ones. I think that is a sufficient
> gesture for our purposes.
> Opinions of other solicited.
We decided not to put in a trivial patch that would make things work for
older NetBSD
Mark Atwood :
> I'm inclined to say yes to the MacOS patches, but I want to hear the
> discussion, and read the patches myself.
I'm inclined to say no, though it's not a hill I'd die on. (1) I want to
stand strong about platform standandards conformance lest we get nibbled
to death by ducks, and
