Yo Richard!
On Fri, 8 May 2020 14:34:31 -0500
Richard Laager wrote:
> On 5/8/20 1:10 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> > I think the year of first publication still has some use as it
> > disambiguates which version of copyright law applies.
>
> The "year of first publication" applies per
On 5/8/20 1:10 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> I think the year of first publication still has some use as it disambiguates
> which version of copyright law applies.
The "year of first publication" applies per copyrightable thing, so if
the file has multiple changes, you'd need multiple year
Yo Sanjeev!
On Sat, 9 May 2020 00:55:08 +0800
Sanjeev Gupta wrote:
> On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
> wrote:
>
> >
> > I did this at the suggestion of Mark Atwood. He is project head for
> > gpsd, NTPsec and other projects. He also works at Amazon on
> > software lic
On Thu, May 7, 2020 at 3:42 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
>
> I did this at the suggestion of Mark Atwood. He is project head for
> gpsd, NTPsec and other projects. He also works at Amazon on software
> license issues. The MAGA have deemed that the current copyright notices
> in gpsd are
Yo John!
On Wed, 06 May 2020 09:02:30 -0400
John Ackermann wrote:
> As a now-retired copyright lawyer, I'd say that removing the years is
> OK.
Yes, but I have not removed the year of first publication, just the
later years. The "(c)" and the years after first pub neer had any legal
meaning.
(cc: to devel@ntpsec)
Hi,
Over at the NTPsec project (whose developer community intersects with
gpsd's) they have scrubbed the Copyright Year from the "Form of Notice".
eg:
-* Copyright (c) University of Delaware 1992-2015 *
+* Copyright University of Delaware
