Yo Achim!
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:07:47 +0200
Achim Gratz via devel wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta via devel writes:
> > Gary, ALPN string checking. The commit mentioned that it would
> > break with previous NTPSec versions.
>
> But it doesn't, because the returned protocol was not checked.
> Otherwi
Sanjeev Gupta via devel writes:
> Gary, ALPN string checking. The commit mentioned that it would break
> with previous NTPSec versions.
But it doesn't, because the returned protocol was not checked.
Otherwise it would have never worked in the first place.
Regards,
Achim.
--
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAV
Sanjeev Gupta said:
> Gary, ALPN string checking. The commit mentioned that it would break with
> previous NTPSec versions.
No. The client didn't check the returned ALPN string. It didn't even look to
see if there was a returned ALPN string.
I added that checking recently. It doesn't bail
Gary, ALPN string checking. The commit mentioned that it would break with
previous NTPSec versions.
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 8:28 AM Gary E. Miller via devel
wrote:
> Yo Sanjeev!
>
> On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:15:56 +0800
> Sanjee
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 5:24 PM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
> Sanjeev Gupta :
> > Eric, there is a incompatibility break, so could we do 1.2.0 , please?
>
> Mark's call. I beliecew he's considering shipping 1.2.0 shortly after.
My impression is that he is waiting for the IETF and IANA to
Yo Sanjeev!
On Thu, 29 Aug 2019 07:15:56 +0800
Sanjeev Gupta via devel wrote:
> Eric, there is a incompatibility break, so could we do 1.2.0 , please?
What is the break?
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmingto
Sanjeev Gupta :
> Eric, there is a incompatibility break, so could we do 1.2.0 , please?
Mark's call. I beliecew he's considering shipping 1.2.0 shortly after.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
___
devel mailing list
deve
Eric, there is a incompatibility break, so could we do 1.2.0 , please?
--
Sanjeev Gupta
+65 98551208 http://www.linkedin.com/in/ghane
On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 1:47 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
> We're preparing for a minor point release, probably 1.17, on or about
> 1 Au
We're preparing for a minor point release, probably 1.17, on or about
1 Aug.
Code freeze starts now. Bug fixes only,
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
"...The Bill of Rights is a literal and absolute document. The First
Amendment doesn't
. However I do not know when the pre-1.2
code freeze is happening and do not wish to make any further changes to
the C code until after SELF except as necessary.
There is also the larger question of do we want variables to be
initialized at definition or within an init_foo()? The code is not
10 matches
Mail list logo