matthew.sel...@twosigma.com said:
> Let's remove this CI target. There's no need to test a specific version
> of AsciiDoc 3 on every commit.
It was working yesterday after James' fix.
It was broken a few minutes ago. So I took your suggestion and commented
it out.
--
These are my opinions
matthew.sel...@twosigma.com said:
> Yes. You can manually run a pipeline manually at
> https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/pipelines
That's the normal CI pipeline collection of tests. Is there an option to
run the scheduled tests that I didn't see?
> What's the advantage to running a pipelin
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 03:16:14PM -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
> Thanks again. Is there a way to manually kick them off? Or get them to
> run an hour to 3 after a commit?
Yes. You can manually run a pipeline manually at
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/pipelines
What's the advantage to runnin
matthew.sel...@twosigma.com said:
> It's an asciidoc implementation written in python 3, instead of ruby.
> We're only testing that the asciidoc program runs without errors. We're
> not checking that it produces the expected output.
Thanks.
Yup. Testing documentation is an interesting problem
On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 01:23:52AM -0800, Hal Murray wrote:
>
> What's interesting about the 3? Are some of the other tests also testing
> plain old asciidoc?
It's an asciidoc implementation written in python 3, instead of ruby. We're
only testing that the asciidoc program runs without error
matthew.sel...@twosigma.com said:
> Let's remove this CI target. There's no need to test a specific version
> of AsciiDoc 3 on every commit.
What's interesting about the 3? Are some of the other tests also testing
plain old asciidoc?
James' fix worked so things are back to normal. Do we wa
On Feb 16, 2025 23:36, Matt Selsky via devel wrote:On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 11:16:28PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> I poked around a bit and didn't find anything with version numbers. There
> was a latest.
asciidoc3.org's blog mentions a complete revamp of their website. See https:
On Sun, Feb 16, 2025 at 11:16:28PM -0800, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> I poked around a bit and didn't find anything with version numbers. There
> was a latest.
asciidoc3.org's blog mentions a complete revamp of their website. See
https://asciidoc3.org/blog-news/2025/
Let's remove this CI ta
AsciiDoc-3-Fedora :
$ wget https://asciidoc3.org/asciidoc3-3.2.3.tar.gz
[0] Downloading 'https://asciidoc3.org/asciidoc3-3.2.3.tar.gz' ...
HTTP ERROR response 404 [https://asciidoc3.org/asciidoc3-3.2.3.tar.gz]
I poked around a bit and didn't find anything with version numbers. There
was a lates
