Re: Release

2025-03-30 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Hal! On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 20:13:17 -0700 Hal Murray wrote: > > A lot of changes in the last few days. > > Nothing has changed in the core ntpd code in a long time. But the build (waf) changed. > Many of the recent changes have been in documentation. Right, doc is not important... > > So

Re: Release

2025-03-30 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Hal! On Sun, 30 Mar 2025 15:16:36 -0700 Hal Murray via devel wrote: > I think we are ready. A lot of changes in the last few days. Some I am not happy about. I suggest at least a week, maybe two week, quiet period for testing. RGDS GARY

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread Hal Murray via devel
> MR 1454 submitted. Approved and merged. It case it helps... All of my systems have python setup and none of them have python2. I've been working on buildprep recently. For all the distros thet I've tested/fixed, buildprep now sets up python to go to python3. -- These are my opinions. I

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread James Browning via devel
On Sunday, March 30, 2025 4:44:51 PM Pacific Daylight Time Fred Wright via devel wrote: > I'm not sure what you mean by "my patches", given that I've never > submitted any for this issue, though I'd suggested what such patches might > do. The patches you were probably going to write if I had no

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025, Fred Wright wrote: On Sun, 30 Mar 2025, James Browning via devel wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2025 5:00:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time Fred Wright via devel wrote: Actually, to be fair, I didn't find a file actually called 'waf' in the upstream repo, but I did find a 'wscript

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025, James Browning via devel wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2025 5:00:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time Fred Wright via devel wrote: Actually, to be fair, I didn't find a file actually called 'waf' in the upstream repo, but I did find a 'wscript' shebanged to 'python', and assumed that

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread James Browning via devel
On Sunday, March 30, 2025 5:00:57 PM Pacific Daylight Time Fred Wright via devel wrote: > Actually, to be fair, I didn't find a file actually called 'waf' in the > upstream repo, but I did find a 'wscript' shebanged to 'python', and > assumed that that was indicative. I assumed that 'waf-light'

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Sat, 29 Mar 2025, Fred Wright via devel wrote: On Sat, 29 Mar 2025, James Browning via devel wrote: Pass; as an alternative, I would drop the exposition in a subsection in INSTALL.adoc; removing only the one byte, leaving the newly incorrect signature intact. Then commit that pottage. I

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Sun, 30 Mar 2025, James Browning via devel wrote: On Sunday, March 30, 2025 4:20:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time Fred Wright via devel wrote: I'd actually been assuming that the incorrect 'python3' shebang line was from upstream. I hadn't realized that the upstream version correctly shebangs i

Re: Anybody using the old waf?

2025-03-30 Thread James Browning via devel
On Sunday, March 30, 2025 4:20:12 PM Pacific Daylight Time Fred Wright via devel wrote: > I'd actually been assuming that the incorrect 'python3' shebang line was > from upstream. I hadn't realized that the upstream version correctly > shebangs it to 'python', and that the change to the incorrec

Release

2025-03-30 Thread Hal Murray via devel
I think we are ready. -- These are my opinions. I hate spam. ___ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org https://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel