Re: ntpsec | ntp_packetstamp: Fix possible time_t size mismatch. (!1414)

2024-12-24 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote: On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:21:14 -0800 (PST) Fred Wright via devel wrote: On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, Gary E. Miller (@garyedmundsmiller) wrote: Gary E_ Miller commented: https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1414#note_2273464732 I d

Re: ntpsec | ntp_packetstamp: Fix possible time_t size mismatch. (!1414)

2024-12-24 Thread Gary E. Miller via devel
Yo Fred! On Tue, 24 Dec 2024 15:21:14 -0800 (PST) Fred Wright via devel wrote: > On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, Gary E. Miller (@garyedmundsmiller) wrote: > > Gary E_ Miller > > commented: > > https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1414#note_2273464732 > > > > > > I don't know about OSX, but t

Re: ntpsec | ntp_packetstamp: Fix possible time_t size mismatch. (!1414)

2024-12-24 Thread James Browning via devel
On Dec 24, 2024 15:21, Fred Wright via devel wrote:> I don't know what issue #832 is, but I don't see any "issues" link on the> project's GitLab page, making it hard to look up.Everyone is talking past each other; this is not good. It might be as bad as you not finding the second issue in the open

Re: ntpsec | ntp_packetstamp: Fix possible time_t size mismatch. (!1414)

2024-12-24 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Tue, 24 Dec 2024, Gary E. Miller (@garyedmundsmiller) wrote: Gary E_ Miller commented: https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/-/merge_requests/1414#note_2273464732 I don't know about OSX, but this is not the proper GNU libc fix. With GNU libc, the size of time_t on 32-bit ABI depends on two #

Re: Old OpenSSL Compatibility (x: Old OpenSSL Cpmpaitibility)

2024-12-24 Thread Fred Wright via devel
On Wed, 18 Dec 2024, Hal Murray wrote: Fred Wright said: I'm always in favor of maximum compatibility. There is a tradeoff between broader compatibility and clutter in the code. Indeed, though a good design keeps aspects dependent on the OS or other outside packages well-segregated.