Hal, on the Rust v Go issue. I am speaking as a consumer of your code, who
builds from source.
There is talk on the LKML, about adding Rust as an allowed language. There
seems to be no objection in principle, work is proceeding. Much of my
knowledge of Rust is from those threads,
The issue I h
Hal Murray :
> Thanks for taking the time to explain things to me.
Why would I not? It's *good* to have someone on the projects who's sufficiently
smart and stubborn to question my premises - please never stop doing that! I
know
more about the problems around getting to a memory-safe language a
> No, I'm pushing Rust away - and determined to exit from C - because of
> reasons in the larger context. We need to get to a memory-safe language, we
> need decadal stability, and we need one with a reasonably low barrier to
> entry for new devs.
> Rust fails two of those tests. Go passes all
