There is a slight chicken/egg problem. You can't test a released version
until it is released.
Yes you can. The push of the commit and the tagging/pushing of the
release tag can easily be separate events.
--
Achim.
(on the road :-)
___
devel ma
On 9/6/20 5:43 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Anybody using the modem driver?
I tested in November, for fun, not any practical reason. NIST's service
is still up. The USNO service was dead. I emailed them and received no
response.
I posted a couple patches, which were merged; see `git log 9a85
> Possibly, but to test some of the code paths (NTS) would take about a day.
> Who wants to donate machine time for the runner?
We can test most of the NTS code paths in a few seconds.
What did you have in mind for "about a day"? The NTS cookie key gets updated
every 24 hours. The last-upda
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 11:13 PM James Browning via devel
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:59 PM Hal Murray via devel
> wrote:
> > Can we run ntpd long enough to test the initialization and much of the
> other code?
>
> Possibly, but to test some of the code paths (NTS) would take about a
> day.
On Fri, Sep 4, 2020 at 3:59 PM Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Can we run ntpd long enough to test the initialization and much of the other
> code?
Possibly, but to test some of the code paths (NTS) would take about a
day. Who wants to donate machine time for the runner?
> I'm thinking of somethi
On Sun, Sep 6, 2020 at 5:21 AM Eric S. Raymond via devel
wrote:
>
> Hal Murray :
> > Please do and/or please fix our local copy. I'm focused on the
> > restrict/unrestrict tangle.
>
> Bug fixed, but I cant finf any way to subnutt uissues on ther
> bugracker. Yes, I have a validayed account ob th
Hal Murray :
> Please do and/or please fix our local copy. I'm focused on the
> restrict/unrestrict tangle.
Bug fixed, but I cant finf any way to subnutt uissues on ther
bugracker. Yes, I have a validayed account ob the site.
Sill looking.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S.
> Yes. I'll do it if yiu have not alreadsy idebtified upsrream.
Please do and/or please fix our local copy. I'm focused on the
restrict/unrestrict tangle.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lis
Hal Murray via devel :
>
> I assume a fix for this should be pushed upstream.
>
> ../../tests/unity/unity.c: In function âUnityFailâ:
> ../../tests/unity/unity.c:1757:6: warning: function might be candidate for
> attribute ânoreturnâ [-Wsuggest-attribute=noreturn]
> 1757 | void UnityFa
