Re: [ntp:hackers] u-blox reference clock driver

2018-08-19 Thread Udo van den Heuvel via devel
On 19-08-18 18:22, Achim Gratz via devel wrote: The trouble with GPIO is that it's either only available on a few boards that aren't very widespread and PCI(-e) cards (aside from the LTP cards) So LPT cards would be acceptable, usable? If so: are they supported already for what we want to do?

Re: [ntp:hackers] u-blox reference clock driver

2018-08-19 Thread Achim Gratz via devel
Udo van den Heuvel via devel writes: >> But how do we instruct the API to use DTR/RTS to signal the u-blox >> receiver? > > Lukas has no plans to adapt for Rs232 ports for x86_64 or x86_32. Well, the correct way anyway would be to provide a line discipline for it in the serial driver, just like it

Re: [ntp:hackers] u-blox reference clock driver

2018-08-19 Thread Udo van den Heuvel via devel
On 17-08-18 12:37, Udo van den Heuvel via devel wrote: On 17-08-18 12:08, Udo van den Heuvel via devel wrote: Kernel patch complains about arm-related files. I guess we need x86/x86_64 equivalent changes? Without the arm-related pach the rest of the patch applies and compiles on x86_64. But h