John D. Bell :
>
> Gentlemen,
>
>
> *Years* ago I used to use yacc, but I quit before bison became the
> _de-facto_ standard. Thus, upon reading its man page I was surprised
> and pleased to see the following command-line options available:
>
> --debug
>
> --report=THINGS
>
> THINGS
Yo Paul!
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:40:52 -0700
Paul Theodoropoulos via devel wrote:
> docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt | 39
This one applied cleanly. Pushed to git head.
Once this one applied, the other one was fine. I put the
options back in the synopsis.
RGDS
GARY
-
Yo Paul!
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 13:41:05 -0700
Paul Theodoropoulos via devel wrote:
> ---
> docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt | 61
> ++- 1 file changed, 20
> insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt
Patch does not apply to
Gentlemen,
*Years* ago I used to use yacc, but I quit before bison became the
_de-facto_ standard. Thus, upon reading its man page I was surprised
and pleased to see the following command-line options available:
--debug
--report=THINGS
THINGS comes from the set of 'state', 'itemset',
Hi!
Starting Sunday, I will be on vacation in Barcelona and Paris, returning on
July 5.
I will not be bringing my laptop with me, and will not have access to any of my
private keys, including GPG, SSH, 2FA, OTP.
In the event of an event of an event, do the right thing.
In the event of an emer
---
docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt | 61 ++-
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt b/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt
index 1329ba4f4..dca76218c 100644
--- a/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt
+++ b/docs/include
---
docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt | 39 +++
1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt b/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt
index 3c2eeb4d6..1329ba4f4 100644
--- a/docs/includes/ntpviz-body.txt
+++ b/docs/includes/nt
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> My goal was a visualization of the control structures the rest of the daemon
> sees - so, as far inside and as digested as possible (this is what the code I
> deleted was aiming at, I think).
The old code printed stuff out to recreate the input config file. For things
Hal Murray :
>
> e...@thyrsus.com said:
> > If we had introspection in the target language we would automatically get
> > the
> > entire parse structure when we dumped each syntax tree, rather than an
> > ad-hoc
> > representation that's mostly leaf nodes. We would also get things like
> > dump
