Thanks for fixing this.
Can you verify that it works as well as builds?
> Newer versions of Solaris support SO_TIMESTAMP per:
> https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E19957-01/820-0724/gcoqs/index.html
That has a link to a setsockopt man page which says:
SunOS 5.11 Last Revised 21 Jan 2007
It doesn't sa
> Can you please look at issue #343? Your commit broke the Solaris build.
> https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/issues/342
I'll respond under the Re: USE_PACKET_TIMESTAMP thread.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@nt
Ian Bruene via devel :
>
>
> On 06/08/2017 05:29 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> >NTPsec does not use Python's getopt(). It uses argparse().
>
> So the real alternatives here are:
>
> 1. Have the dual -l/-L flags
>
> 2. Convert ntpq from getopt to argparse
Ian, I'm going to mutter that
Yo Matthew!
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 20:47:51 -0400
Matthew Selsky via devel wrote:
> Newer versions of Solaris support SO_TIMESTAMP per:
So why does the compile failt on buildbot? Is buildbot on an old version?
RGDS
GARY
---
G
On Thu, Jun 08, 2017 at 12:26:21AM -0700, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> Can anybody confirm that Solaris really doesn't have time stamps? I thought
> we decided that all modern OSes did. That's why we could rip out the SIGIO
> stuff.
>
> I took a quick google and couldn't find any mention of a
Yo Hal!
Can you please look at issue #343? Your commit broke the Solaris build.
https://gitlab.com/NTPsec/ntpsec/issues/342
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@r
Yo Ian!
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:34:27 -0500
Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 05:29 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> > NTPsec does not use Python's getopt(). It uses argparse().
>
> So the real alternatives here are:
>
> 1. Have the dual -l/-L flags
Yuck. Non orthogonal to nt
On 06/08/2017 05:29 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
NTPsec does not use Python's getopt(). It uses argparse().
So the real alternatives here are:
1. Have the dual -l/-L flags
2. Convert ntpq from getopt to argparse
--
In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave? Money? Power?
No. A
Yo Ian!
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 17:31:01 -0500
Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
> On 06/08/2017 05:18 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
> > So, what do you think is still unresolved?
>
> At this point I think we have solved it, simply by eliminating the
> alternatives. It's all part of the ntpq fla
On 06/08/2017 05:18 PM, Gary E. Miller via devel wrote:
So, what do you think is still unresolved?
At this point I think we have solved it, simply by eliminating the
alternatives. It's all part of the ntpq flag discussion.
--
In the end; what separates a Man, from a Slave? Money? Power?
N
Yo Ian!
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:29:19 -0500
Ian Bruene via devel wrote:
> >> "A (':') shall be returned if getopt() detects a missing
> >> argument and the first character of optstring was a (':')."
> >>
> >> So optional optarg can be valid POXIX.
> > I didn't know that. Thanks.
>
> Unfort
Yo Ian!
On Thu, 08 Jun 2017 20:27:50 +
Ian Bruene wrote:
> The "DNS[...]" bug is fixed in !483, the rest of the fix requires
> change in the debugging flags. Once some sort of agreement is arrived
> at on the devlist.
So, what do you think is still unresolved?
RGDS
GARY
---
On 06/08/2017 02:48 PM, Eric S. Raymond via devel wrote:
Gary E. Miller via devel :
Well, more to be learned, my getopt(3p) is not the same as what I see on
unix.com. The online copy did not include the snippet I quoted. You
can confirm on the POSIX site for getopt(3P):
http://www.unix.com/
Gary E. Miller via devel :
> Well, more to be learned, my getopt(3p) is not the same as what I see on
> unix.com. The online copy did not include the snippet I quoted. You
> can confirm on the POSIX site for getopt(3P):
>
> http://www.unix.com/man-page/posix/3p/getopt/
>
> But they both had thi
Hal Murray :
>
> >> If Solaris doesn't support time stamps, I would expect
> >> ntp_packetstamp to die on a #error. What happened with it?
>
> > I factored the code so that if waf configure doesn't find a way to get
> > packet arrival times from the UDP layer it uses the arrival time collected
>
>> If Solaris doesn't support time stamps, I would expect
>> ntp_packetstamp to die on a #error. What happened with it?
> I factored the code so that if waf configure doesn't find a way to get
> packet arrival times from the UDP layer it uses the arrival time collected
> in userspace (ntp_packet
Yo Eric!
On Thu, 8 Jun 2017 15:01:55 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Gary E. Miller via devel :
> > Yo Eric!
> >
> > On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:46:42 -0400
> > "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> >
> > > Gary E. Miller via devel :
> > > > Just make the filename optional. So -l or -l filename
> > >
Hal Murray via devel :
> Can anybody confirm that Solaris really doesn't have time stamps? I thought
> we decided that all modern OSes did. That's why we could rip out the SIGIO
> stuff.
>
> I took a quick google and couldn't find any mention of anything that looked
> like a time stamp in a S
Gary E. Miller via devel :
> Yo Eric!
>
> On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:46:42 -0400
> "Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
>
> > Gary E. Miller via devel :
> > > Just make the filename optional. So -l or -l filename
> >
> > Sadly, not practical with any varint of C or Python getopt. We'd have
> > to roll our own
On 06/08/2017 03:22 AM, Hal Murray wrote:
If you are looking at ntpq, it would be nice if there was a simple way to see
the packets sent/received and not much else.
A few of the packets have binary data. It may be as simple as only assoc IDs
are in binary. Everything else is raw ascii so it
If you are looking at ntpq, it would be nice if there was a simple way to see
the packets sent/received and not much else.
A few of the packets have binary data. It may be as simple as only assoc IDs
are in binary. Everything else is raw ascii so it doesn't need any
complicated parsing or re
Can anybody confirm that Solaris really doesn't have time stamps? I thought
we decided that all modern OSes did. That's why we could rip out the SIGIO
stuff.
I took a quick google and couldn't find any mention of anything that looked
like a time stamp in a Solaris man page for setsockopt. Bu
Yo Eric!
On Wed, 7 Jun 2017 22:46:42 -0400
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Gary E. Miller via devel :
> > Just make the filename optional. So -l or -l filename
>
> Sadly, not practical with any varint of C or Python getopt. We'd have
> to roll our own, and that way madnes lies.
man geetopt:
"If
23 matches
Mail list logo
