> So, you want me to save a tool you have never used? I guess next week I'll
> see if it even works. Or has any use.
It's not so much that I want to save it, but please don't throw it out until
somebody has taken time to see if it is useful and/or find a better way.
--
These are my opinion
Yo Hal!
On Sat, 27 May 2017 18:18:50 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > Have you ever enabled, and used ISC_PLATFORM_USEBACKTRACE?
>
> No. That never got to the top of my list.
So, you want me to save a tool you have never used? I guess next week
I'll see if it even works. Or has any use.
RGDS
The CI builds worked, and I usually start with a ./waf distclean so I
didn't notice that moving the function into libntp breaks builds that
have not been cleaned.
While attempting to fix classic bug 2659 I noticed another problem
with my commit d74cf1e3: Since the UTC offset is now required to
obta
> Have you ever enabled, and used ISC_PLATFORM_USEBACKTRACE?
No. That never got to the top of my list.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Yo All!
Looks like MR 422 broke some builds. Trevor, can you look at this?
RGDS
GARY
---
Gary E. Miller Rellim 109 NW Wilmington Ave., Suite E, Bend, OR 97703
g...@rellim.com Tel:+1 541 382 8588
Veritas
Please revert commit d74cf1e3 if possible. It seems that the MR page
is only available when not logged in, so I can't comment there.
On Sat, 27 May 2017 12:00:00 +, you wrote:
>Date: Fri, 26 May 2017 14:57:37 -0700
>From: "Gary E. Miller"
>To:
>Subject: ?MR 422
>Message-ID: <20170526145737.7
Yo Hal!
On Sat, 27 May 2017 13:39:09 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > Do all you need is a good way to debug the never ending seccomp
> > issues?
>
> Correct.
OK, I agree that is a problem that needs work.. I do not how
ISC_PLATFORM_USEBACKTRACE applies to that problem at all.
Have you ever en
> Do all you need is a good way to debug the never ending seccomp issues?
Correct.
The case I worry about is a once-a-week bug on a busy server.
seccomp is Linux-only so whatever solution(s) we come up with doesn't need to
be POSIX. Cross platform would be nice, but I'll take whatever I can
Yo Hal!
On Fri, 26 May 2017 21:23:35 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > Anyone care?
>
> Yes.
Have you ever used it? Have you used it recentlly? Does it even work?
> If we are serious about seccomp, we need something like that in order
> to debug the false positives.
How would ISC_PLATFORM_USEB
