Yo Achim!
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 20:56:36 +0100
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Hal Murray writes:
> > Looks like we are getting into the old precision vs accuracy tangle.
> > Do we have a glossary with useful descriptions?
> > That slot should represent the number of useful bits.
>
> It really doesn't hel
Yo Achim!
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 20:36:15 +0100
Achim Gratz wrote:
> Gary E. Miller writes:
> >> That slot should represent the number of useful bits.
> >
> > Yup. And in Selsky's case he really does have -30.
>
> Nope.
I disagree.
> The resolution of the numbers is 1ns, the useful digits a
Gary E. Miller :
> Writing up saomething that some will agree with will be relatively easy.
>
> Changing the ntpsec doc and code to match will be nasty.
But probably worth doing.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at ht
Hal Murray writes:
> Looks like we are getting into the old precision vs accuracy tangle.
> Do we have a glossary with useful descriptions?
> That slot should represent the number of useful bits.
It really doesn't help that precision, accuracy and resolution have a
number of different meanings dep
Gary E. Miller writes:
>> That slot should represent the number of useful bits.
>
> Yup. And in Selsky's case he really does have -30.
Nope. The resolution of the numbers is 1ns, the useful digits aka
precision of the measurement doesn't extend that far down. That -30
would be equivalent to 931
Yo Eric!
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017 06:16:11 -0500
"Eric S. Raymond" wrote:
> Hal Murray :
> > Do we have a glossary with useful descriptions?
>
> I've saved an email thread by Gary and Achim and was planning to try
> to digest it into a series of entries for our glossary. I might get
> to that toda
Yo Hal!
On Tue, 07 Feb 2017 02:56:24 -0800
Hal Murray wrote:
> g...@rellim.com said:
> > OTOH, prolly best to set it to -30, just for grins. Someday it
> > might matter, or I might have missed something, or just to seem to
> > do the right thing.
>
> Looks like we are getting into the old p
Hal Murray :
> Do we have a glossary with useful descriptions?
I've saved an email thread by Gary and Achim and was planning to try
to digest it into a series of entries for our glossary. I might get
to that today.
I expect you'll be involved in the resulting description up to your
eyeballs. :-)
g...@rellim.com said:
> OTOH, prolly best to set it to -30, just for grins. Someday it might
> matter, or I might have missed something, or just to seem to do the right
> thing.
Looks like we are getting into the old precision vs accuracy tangle.
Do we have a glossary with useful descriptions?
> What do I do if I don't have an existing ntp.conf ?
Assuming ntpsec builds...
There are sample config files in config/
contrib/ntp.conf.log.sample has logging which you probably want.
it has lots of comments.
It is setup to use us.pool.ntp.org
If you aren't in the us, you should probably cha
10 matches
Mail list logo