No rawstats or protostats either.
e...@thyrsus.com said:
> It was adding "subtype" as an alias for "mode" in the lexical analyzer. This
> somehow confuses the crap out of the parser's FSM. ...
Remember the saveconfigandquit stuff you ripped out? That would have caught
this. (if we had used it
OK, this is officially bizarre.
Earlier this evening I got a report from Gary that ntpd wasn't logging
peerstats. I'd just done a significan change to logging ("More
magic-address banishment.) so I hastily reverted that. Then tested -
still no good, no peerstats.
Picking an arbitrary revision a
Hal Murray :
> On NetBSD:
> 07-06T15:42:17 ntpd[4940]: root can't be dropped due to missing capabilities.
So don't do that, then. Drop root, I mean. Without some equivalent of Linux
or Solaris fine-grained privilege control, setting the clock won't work
afterwards.
What has NetBSD been doing bef
Hal Murray :
>
> It's probably all in NEWS (or should be), but that's chronological and seems
> hard to read. For example, the deleted refclocks are scattered all over the
> place.
>
> I think I'm suggesting something like CHANGES-form-ntp-classic
https://docs.ntpsec.org/latest/
For your con
On NetBSD:
07-06T15:42:17 ntpd[4940]: root can't be dropped due to missing capabilities.
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
dfoxfra...@gmail.com said:
> With Eric's permission, I have removed support for interleaved mode in my
> proto-refactor branch. Here is its commit-message eulogy:
Seems fine with me. I've never used it.
We should test things to make sure nothing strange happens. I think that
requires 4 syste
It's probably all in NEWS (or should be), but that's chronological and seems
hard to read. For example, the deleted refclocks are scattered all over the
place.
I think I'm suggesting something like CHANGES-form-ntp-classic
--
These are my opinions. I hate spam.
_
Daniel Franke :
> With Eric's permission, I have removed support for interleaved mode in
> my proto-refactor branch.
I note for the record that said permission was not given casually.
In fact, I have considered this feature dodgy and likely to be
failure-prone since I first tripped over it in the
With Eric's permission, I have removed support for interleaved mode in
my proto-refactor branch. Here is its commit-message eulogy:
Interleaved mode was an invention intended to improve timekeeping
precision in symmetric and broadcast mode. The problem it intended to
solve is that tran
Hal Murray :
> I just pushed a fix. Would you please sanity check...
Will do.
--
http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond
___
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I just pushed a fix. Would you please sanity check...
For servers, minpoll and maxpoll default to 6 and 10. There is also a check
to make sure that minpoll isn't greater than maxpoll.
For refclocks, minpoll defaults to 6 and maxpoll defaults to minpoll.
The problem is that you were storing m
11 matches
Mail list logo
