Yo Hal!
On Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:46:13 -0700
Hal Murray wrote:
> > 1 0.51 1f0 L 3 3 2877243 18012 202.136.171.166
> > 0 1.14 1f0 L 3 4 1282569 54878 52.74.115.126
>
> Wow! The bottom two take the record. If I read that right, they
> have been hammering away for over 2 weeks.
http://www.daemonology.net/blog/2016-04-11-write-opinionated-workarounds.html
Write opinionated workarounds
by Colin Percival
A few years ago, I decided that I should aim for my code to be as portable
as possible. This generally meant targeting POSIX; in some cases I required
slightly more, e.g.,
gha...@gmail.com said:
> lstint avgint rstr r m v count rport remote address
> ==
> 0 0.01 1f0 L 3 4 32250 123 27.126.220.102
> 0 0.02 1f0 L 3 4 35659 123 27.126.220.105
> 0 0.02 1f0 L 3 4 3
