From: David Llewellyn-Jones [da...@flypig.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 4:22 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] libconnman-qt
> On 23/01/2020 03:59, David Weidenkopf wrote:
>> Hi, I see that sailfish has forke
On 23/01/2020 03:59, David Weidenkopf wrote:
> Hi, I see that sailfish has forked connman. Is libconnman-qt
> compatible with the upstream connman?
There are certainly some incompatibilities, I'm afraid. As just a couple
of examples, the Sailfish connman fork exposes the ResetCounters and
CreateSer
Thanks! I did not think to look there, my apologies.
Regards
David
From: David Llewellyn-Jones [da...@flypig.co.uk]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2019 9:28 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Cc: David Weidenkopf
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] libconnman-qt
On 24/07/2019 17:16, David Weidenkopf wrote:
> Hi David, thanks for the pointers, very helpful to be able to see the
> code. I could not find the code for TechnologyModel. Is that closed
> source as well? Is it C++ or QML?
>
> That is the component that interests me the most at this point.
> Thank
: David Llewellyn-Jones [da...@flypig.co.uk]
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2019 1:20 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Cc: David Weidenkopf
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] libconnman-qt application examples
On 22/07/2019 23:57, David Weidenkopf wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to mention an assumption on my part. Gi
On 22/07/2019 23:57, David Weidenkopf wrote:
> Sorry, I forgot to mention an assumption on my part. Given the API
> design, it looks like it is usable from QML, and no C++ would be
> necessary. Is that an incorrect assumption?
Hi David,
I'm struggling a bit with your negatives, but... no, this is
Sorry, I forgot to mention an assumption on my part. Given the API design, it
looks like it is usable from QML, and no C++ would be necessary. Is that an
incorrect assumption?
Thanks
From: Devel [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of David Weidenkopf
