Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-05-21 Thread Kimmo Lindholm
Yep, it seems to work according to samples in componentgallery project. -Original Message- I am using GlassItem in Framrekkari and that is in official Jolla store. So it seems to be allowed. :) Best greetings Buschmann Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2014, 07:33:13 schrieb Kimmo Lindholm: > Is t

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-05-21 Thread Matthias Fehring
I am using GlassItem in Framrekkari and that is in official Jolla store. So it seems to be allowed. :) Best greetings Buschmann Am Sonntag, 18. Mai 2014, 07:33:13 schrieb Kimmo Lindholm: > Is the GlassItem still no-no ? > > On Monday 06 January 2014 01:16 Martin Jones wrote: > > > Hi, > > >

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-05-18 Thread Kimmo Lindholm
Is the GlassItem still no-no ? On Monday 06 January 2014 01:16 Martin Jones wrote: > Hi, > > As a general rule, if it’s not documented then it isn’t public API. > > The GlassItem API hasn’t been reviewed for public use. It will > probably change and is not safe for use. ___

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-05-18 Thread Kimmo Lindholm
Any progress on the documentation of OpacityRampEffect ? -kimmo > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:16 AM, Martin Jones wrote: >> ... >> OpacityRampEffect has been reviewed for public use, but is not yet >> documented. We’ll do this asap. ___ SailfishOS.org

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-07 Thread Thomas Tanghus
On Monday 06 January 2014 01:16 Martin Jones wrote: > Hi, > > As a general rule, if it’s not documented then it isn’t public API. > > The GlassItem API hasn’t been reviewed for public use. It will probably > change and is not safe for use. So apps using GlassItem will be rejected from harbour?

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-07 Thread Luciano Montanaro
Thank you for the answer, I can live with that for now. Regards, Luciano On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 12:24 AM, Martin Jones wrote: > > On 6 Jan 2014, at 9:57 pm, Timur Kristóf wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > So, we're okay with using PullDownMenu::busy and OpacityRampEffect, but we > should avoid GlassIte

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-06 Thread Martin Jones
On 6 Jan 2014, at 9:57 pm, Timur Kristóf mailto:timur.kris...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Martin, So, we're okay with using PullDownMenu::busy and OpacityRampEffect, but we should avoid GlassItem for the moment. Right? Yes. For OpacityRampEffect, use only the properties used in the silica componen

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-06 Thread Timur Kristóf
Hey Robin, What is the recommended way to use those things in a Sailfish app right now? Thanks, Timur Timur On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Robin Burchell wrote: > For things in Qt itself, keep an eye on Qt upstream. When they are part > of an official Qt release (that is: stable API), the

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-06 Thread Robin Burchell
For things in Qt itself, keep an eye on Qt upstream. When they are part of an official Qt release (that is: stable API), then we can look at them when we upgrade. As far as I know, nobody has yet prioritised work on either of those, and platform support is scarce, so I don’t see them happening

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-06 Thread Timur Kristóf
Hi Martin, So, we're okay with using PullDownMenu::busy and OpacityRampEffect, but we should avoid GlassItem for the moment. Right? What about other APIs that are there but aren't allowed yet, such as QtDocGallery and QtFeedback? When can we use those in harbour? Thanks, Timur Timur On Mon,

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-05 Thread Martin Jones
Hi, As a general rule, if it’s not documented then it isn’t public API. The GlassItem API hasn’t been reviewed for public use. It will probably change and is not safe for use. The busy property of PullDownMenu is documented, but the docs have not been updated in the SDK. OpacityRampEffect has b

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-05 Thread Oleksii Serdiuk
They're not documented because they might not be ready for prime time yet or their API might still change. So I'd be careful using them. On 03.01.2014 12:26, Timur Kristóf wrote: Hi Luciano, My guess is that since those components are part of Silica and their imports are allowed in the harbour

Re: [SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-03 Thread Timur Kristóf
Hi Luciano, My guess is that since those components are part of Silica and their imports are allowed in the harbour, it is OK to use them. I don't know their actual official status but I guess they are simply not documented because of a mistake, not because they are disallowed. Would be nice to h

[SailfishDevel] Undocumented Silica components

2014-01-02 Thread Luciano Montanaro
I don't know if this has been addresed already, but... In my application, I would like to use a few components that the componentgallery is demoing, but that are not documented in the reference documentation. Is it OK to use everything that works there? Specifically, I want to use * OpacityRampE