Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-29 Thread Putze Sven
Hi, I am just wondering why there was the idea "hey, let's do some bondage and use the Google API" (or Facebook or...) instead of using CardDav and CalDav from the beginning. Shouldn't that have been the natural choice for an more or less open phone? Nevertheless I will be happy when the alter

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-27 Thread Marcin M.
@Martin: And which statement in the TOS of, let's take, Google does it? I didn't notice it (or maybe it's a fairly new statement) -- Marcin 2014-01-27 Jarkko Lietolahti > Hi, > This might shed some infromation about this issue: > http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/04/facebook-google-contacts/# > >

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-27 Thread Jarkko Lietolahti
Hi, This might shed some infromation about this issue: http://techcrunch.com/2010/11/04/facebook-google-contacts/# On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 2:48 AM, Thomas Tanghus wrote: > On Sunday 26 January 2014 20:48 Bernd Wachter wrote: > > Our plans for contacts are to first make all local contacts avail

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Thomas Tanghus
On Sunday 26 January 2014 20:48 Bernd Wachter wrote: > Our plans for contacts are to first make all local contacts available to > your applications, and then fine-tune how we're dealing with contacts > from 3rd party services. Sounds like a reasonable approach. You shouldn't be blocked from your

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Bernd Wachter
Gabriel Böhme writes: > So Jolla get's punishment, because a user want's to use HIS Contacts, > because they are fetched from 3rd party service, the user put HIS > contacts?! - Wow strange. Technically it's app access, but obviously it boils down to some services not wanting you to freely do wi

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Martin Grimme
2014-01-26, Gabriel Böhme : > So Jolla get's punishment, because a user want's to use HIS Contacts, > because they are fetched from 3rd party service, the user put HIS > contacts?! - Wow strange. What makes you think that the contacts you sync from a 3rd party service are still YOUR contacts? Have

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Gabriel Böhme
So Jolla get's punishment, because a user want's to use HIS Contacts, because they are fetched from 3rd party service, the user put HIS contacts?! - Wow strange. But making "added by hand" contacts is/could be possible? And what about if the user have to accept that a app wants to use his contact

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Andrey Kozhevnikov
issue not in app permissions. issue in restriction access to "cloud" contacts got from 3rd party services, and so on On 27.01.2014 00:21, Marcin M. wrote: And wouldn't separate permission for each app solve the thing? -- Marcin 2014-01-26 Bernd Wachter >

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Marcin M.
And wouldn't separate permission for each app solve the thing? -- Marcin 2014-01-26 Bernd Wachter > writes: > > > Hi Sven > > > > I am equally curious: > > > > Reading and rereading Bernd's mail I see > > > > " ..contacts synced to the device from some third party services..." > > > > I entere

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-26 Thread Bernd Wachter
writes: > Hi Sven > > I am equally curious: > > Reading and rereading Bernd's mail I see > > " ..contacts synced to the device from some third party services..." > > I entered all the contacts on my phone myself (most via bluetooth from > the N9). No third parties are involved at all. So surely m

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-25 Thread christopher . lamb
Hi Sven I am equally curious: Reading and rereading Bernd's mail I see " ..contacts synced to the device from some third party services..." I entered all the contacts on my phone myself (most via bluetooth from the N9). No third parties are involved at all. So surely my apps should have fu

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-25 Thread Putze Sven
Hi, could you please shed some light about this issue? What kind of service agreements? Between whom? Was there some hidden hint in the fine print I did not read why I bought the phone? Or to put it in some more provocative way: those contact data is *my* data and *I* want to decide what inform

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-21 Thread Bernd Wachter
Harald Schmitt writes: Hi, > I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like > to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file > PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts > is rejected by the new validation tool. > How can I access contacts in a harbour app? Is there an example? Short

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-21 Thread Harald Schmitt
Am 21.01.2014 11:28, schrieb Andrey Kozhevnikov: > On 21.01.2014 16:15, Harald Schmitt wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like >> to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file >> PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts >> is rejected by the new validation t

Re: [SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-21 Thread Andrey Kozhevnikov
is fetching Contacts allowed to Harbour at all? On 21.01.2014 16:15, Harald Schmitt wrote: Hi, I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts is rejected by the new validation tool. How can I ac

[SailfishDevel] Harbour compliant way to read contacts

2014-01-21 Thread Harald Schmitt
Hi, I tried to use QContactManager, QContact and so on for an app I'd like to publish on harbour, but the line in my .pro file PKGCONFIG += Qt5Contacts is rejected by the new validation tool. How can I access contacts in a harbour app? Is there an example? Best regards, Harald ___