Re: [SailfishDevel] Deploy as RPM Package vs Deploy By Building As RPM Package

2014-01-07 Thread Sven Putze
That wording could use some adjustments :-) On 07.01.2014, at 13:33, Timur Kristóf wrote: > "Deploy by Building an RPM Package" really means: "Just build an RPM and > don't deploy". > > > Timur > > > > On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:30 PM, David Greaves wrote: > On 06/01/14 16:21, christopher.l

Re: [SailfishDevel] Deploy as RPM Package vs Deploy By Building As RPM Package

2014-01-07 Thread Timur Kristóf
"Deploy by Building an RPM Package" really means: "Just build an RPM and don't deploy". Timur On Mon, Jan 6, 2014 at 5:30 PM, David Greaves wrote: > On 06/01/14 16:21, christopher.l...@thurweb.ch wrote: > > Hi All > > > > In QtCreator for the Sailfish i486-x86 Target I have two options > > >

[SailfishDevel] Deploy as RPM Package vs Deploy By Building As RPM Package

2014-01-06 Thread christopher . lamb
Hi All In QtCreator for the Sailfish i486-x86 Target I have two options "Deploy as Binaries" and "Deploy as RPM Package" For the Sailfish Arm target there is a third option "Deploy by Building an RPM Package" What is the difference between "Deploy as RPM Package" and "Deploy By Building A

Re: [SailfishDevel] Deploy as RPM Package vs Deploy By Building As RPM Package

2014-01-06 Thread David Greaves
On 06/01/14 16:21, christopher.l...@thurweb.ch wrote: > Hi All > > In QtCreator for the Sailfish i486-x86 Target I have two options > > "Deploy as Binaries" > > and > > "Deploy as RPM Package" > > For the Sailfish Arm target there is a third option > > "Deploy by Building an RPM Package" > >