Dear Pekka,
thank you very much - its way better to use it through pkgconfig. Didn't
find this option a while ago when I was writing original SPEC files and
didn't look for it either.
Cheers,
Rinigus
On Mon, May 13, 2019 at 10:24 AM Pekka Vuorela
wrote:
> On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 20:47 +0300, ri
On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 20:47 +0300, rinigus wrote:
> Martin,
>
> thanks for pointing in this direction. I added %dump in SPEC and the
> only reasonable macro that I could see was _repository. So, I added
> the following to differentiate the dependencies:
>
> %if %{_repository} == "sailfish_3.0.2.
All worked as soon as %{_repository} is as in
%if "%{_repository}" == "sailfish_3.0.2.8_armv7hl"
BuildRequires: libicu52-devel
%else
BuildRequires: libicu-devel
%endif
Rinigus
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:56 PM rinigus wrote:
> PS: And it failed on 3.0.2 - back to the drawing board...
>
> On Sun,
PS: And it failed on 3.0.2 - back to the drawing board...
On Sun, May 12, 2019 at 8:47 PM rinigus wrote:
> Martin,
>
> thanks for pointing in this direction. I added %dump in SPEC and the only
> reasonable macro that I could see was _repository. So, I added the
> following to differentiate the d
Martin,
thanks for pointing in this direction. I added %dump in SPEC and the only
reasonable macro that I could see was _repository. So, I added the
following to differentiate the dependencies:
%if %{_repository} == "sailfish_3.0.2.8_armv7hl"
BuildRequires: libicu52-devel
%else
BuildRequires: lib
Sat, 11 May 2019 17:53:27 +0300 Rinigus :
Summary from IRC chat on the topic: David spotted that BuildRequires
is not mentioned in the list of boolean dependencies (thank you!).
So, next question: which condition could I use in %if expansion of
SPEC to distinguish SFOS 3.0.3.x from the earlier
Summary from IRC chat on the topic: David spotted that BuildRequires is not
mentioned in the list of boolean dependencies (thank you!).
So, next question: which condition could I use in %if expansion of SPEC to
distinguish SFOS 3.0.3.x from the earlier versions? Maybe there is some
variable define
Hi,
the problem is while building at OBS:
https://build.merproject.org/package/show/home:rinigus:maps/mapnik
Rinigus
On Sat, May 11, 2019 at 4:30 PM David Llewellyn-Jones
wrote:
> On 11/05/2019 16:12, rinigus wrote:
> [snip]
> > BuildRequires: (libicu52-devel or libicu-devel)
> >
> > as in
> >
On 11/05/2019 16:12, rinigus wrote:
[snip]
> BuildRequires: (libicu52-devel or libicu-devel)
>
> as in
> https://github.com/rinigus/pkg-mapnik/blob/da5b6a11667b286c89bbee93eb57e2d4d52d5902/rpm/mapnik.spec#L16
>
[snip]
> Hence the question - how can I add support for 3.0.2.x and 3.0.3.x using
> t
Hi,
with SFOS 3.0.3.x, we have new ICU version which is packaged into libicu
and libicu-devel. As a result, name of the package is different from the
earlier one (had icu52 in the names) and RPM SPEC files need to change the
dependency accordingly. I tried to use `or` in the SPEC without any
succe
10 matches
Mail list logo
