Re: [SailfishDevel] Qt 5.2 in devel

2014-06-18 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Wednesday 18 June 2014 06:10:06 Robin Burchell wrote: > Hello intrepid developers, > > Qt 5.2 rebuilds have (finally, thank god) finished in devel. I’ve updated a > single device (via version —dup) so far without too many ill effects (see > below), and done some brief smoke testing. The device

Re: [SailfishDevel] QThread priority

2014-05-29 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Thursday 29 May 2014 13:55:40 Denis Zalevskiy wrote: > To run parser in parallel just to get results in the main thread it is > better to use QtConcurrent::run() + QFutureWatcher. > Also, to set priority I guess you can use posix pthread functions, smth. like ::pthread_set

Re: [SailfishDevel] QThread priority

2014-05-29 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Wednesday 28 May 2014 22:07:20 Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote: > need to look into your parseReadyData > > 28.05.2014 22:03, Krisztian Olah ?: > > Hi Andrey, > > > >Thanks for the answer, your snippet looks very similar to what I > > > > have. Perhaps if I posted my code segment would be of

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-27 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Saturday 24 May 2014 21:53:13 Erik Lundin wrote: > 2014-05-24 12:56, christopher.l...@thurweb.ch skrev: > > My suggestion is that rather than splitting into multiple mailing lists, > > which does not really cure anything, you replace the mailing lists with > > a forum. I agree it would be crazy

Re: [SailfishDevel] Acceptable Behaviour Guidelines - you decide

2014-05-27 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Tuesday 27 May 2014 09:57:26 Stefano Mosconi wrote: > It seems that the original topic was a bit forgotten in favor of the forum > vs. ML vs. TJC (which is a good and intersting topic but no matter what > tool we use we will have to go back to the main question). > > Just to try to steer the bo

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-27 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
Hi, On Tuesday 27 May 2014 08:17:52 Christopher Lamb wrote: > Hi all > > I am pleasantly surprised at the volume of traffic resulting from a > thread that I innocently kicked of that the weekend. Thanks for the > active and balanced discussion. > > I probably won't be able to take an active part

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-26 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
ubscribe to it and get both e-mail notifications as also get it on the side bar. Also unsubscription is simple but it is still possible to reply. - denis > -kimmo > > -Original Message- > From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org > [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-26 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
back to Jolla (TJC might do this > better), and is less efficient than ML for devs to devs discussions. > > So I appreciate to have the 3 tools available, and would love to see Jolla > cooperate with TMO as a forum of choice for discussions. > > - Mail original - > D

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-26 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:18:00 Luca Donaggio wrote: > +1 for keeping this ML and (eventually) improving TJC. > > Personally, TJC currently suffers of one big drawback, which is not even > technical: it is perceived more as a generic issue-reporting / > feature-requesting tool than anything else.

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-26 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:52:43 Andrea Bernabei wrote: > I agree, sections and subsections are important, random tags can't take > their role imho :/ > > An alternative could be to force people to use only a LIMITED number of > tags decided by Jolla? > > in that way we'd only have tags which basic

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-26 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Monday 26 May 2014 10:49:51 sfietkonstan...@free.fr wrote: > +1 > TMO is often the forum of choice for many developers (me included), to maybe because you are using TMO for a long time and have a habbit to use it ? Also because many people who develop and developed for mobile linux also has t

Re: [SailfishDevel] was "Acceptable Behaviour.." --> Forum

2014-05-25 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
On Sunday 25 May 2014 18:43:03 Saija Saarenpää wrote: > I prefer the editing abilities a forum gives over everything else. > For example QtProject forum http://qt-project.org has done it really well. > They have the possibility to extend the documentation by leaving notes and > code examples. Also

Re: [SailfishDevel] qca-qt5 for Jolla phone

2013-12-19 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
are using it. - denis On 19.12.2013 13:37, Denis Zalevskiy wrote: Hi Ruediger, On 12/17/2013 11:16 PM, Ruediger Gad wrote: Hi, as far as I can see, qca-qt5 is not available in the pre-installed repositories of the Jolla phone. So, my questions are: - Is it planned to make it available (qca

Re: [SailfishDevel] qca-qt5 for Jolla phone

2013-12-18 Thread Denis Zalevskiy
Hi Ruediger, On 12/17/2013 11:16 PM, Ruediger Gad wrote: Hi, as far as I can see, qca-qt5 is not available in the pre-installed repositories of the Jolla phone. So, my questions are: - Is it planned to make it available (qca-qt5 is already in nemo:devel:mw on Mer OBS.)? If this package is in th